IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Dime] WGLC for draft-ietf-dime-extended-naptr

Sebastien Decugis <sdecugis@nict.go.jp> Tue, 11 January 2011 01:42 UTC

Return-Path: <sdecugis@nict.go.jp>
X-Original-To: dime@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dime@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21F583A68F7 for <dime@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 10 Jan 2011 17:42:28 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.172
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.172 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.077, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_FR=0.35]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PCkwb8n20RZN for <dime@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 10 Jan 2011 17:42:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: from sd-22293.dedibox.fr (sd-22293.dedibox.fr [88.191.125.50]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B3D43A68F5 for <dime@ietf.org>; Mon, 10 Jan 2011 17:42:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sd-22293.dedibox.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C64C948EC for <dime@ietf.org>; Tue, 11 Jan 2011 02:44:26 +0100 (CET)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at sd-22293.dedibox.fr
Received: from sd-22293.dedibox.fr ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (sd-22293.dedibox.fr [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mvQ1wYC-+IUd for <dime@ietf.org>; Tue, 11 Jan 2011 02:44:16 +0100 (CET)
Received: from [202.249.37.5] (morbier.koganei.wide.ad.jp [202.249.37.5]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by sd-22293.dedibox.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7362C9421E for <dime@ietf.org>; Tue, 11 Jan 2011 02:44:15 +0100 (CET)
Message-ID: <4D2BB5F1.8030009@nict.go.jp>
Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2011 10:44:17 +0900
From: Sebastien Decugis <sdecugis@nict.go.jp>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.0; fr; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101207 Thunderbird/3.1.7
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: dime@ietf.org
References: <20110106191502.10151.87573.idtracker@localhost> <AANLkTi=3TduoqU2Ufcp=diAE=BwvX1KutNQXmX5r5aRa@mail.gmail.com> <EB0843F7-A291-439C-8F20-1F6993576B07@gmail.com> <002701cbaf12$43eabb00$cbc03100$@net> <AANLkTimbsjx=4qptHoYUf3Hkvb1q19NiKbj4VaToSB8B@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTimbsjx=4qptHoYUf3Hkvb1q19NiKbj4VaToSB8B@mail.gmail.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.1
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [Dime] WGLC for draft-ietf-dime-extended-naptr
X-BeenThere: dime@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Diameter Maintanence and Extentions Working Group <dime.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dime>, <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dime>
List-Post: <mailto:dime@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dime>, <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2011 01:42:28 -0000

Hi,

>> Since The Diameter Base
>> protocol includes rudimentary accounting functionality it doesn't seem
>> completely unreasonable that Diameter Base might be used as a stand-alone
>> app.
> Ok, I hadn't appreciated that stand-alone usage of Base. Looking at
> section 7.1, it appears to be missing two entries: one for "aaa" and
> one for "aaa+ap0". The "aaa" entry could be deleted if rfc3588bis is
> published first.
If I understand correctly the discussion, I think you mean here
"aaa+ap3". Application 0 is used for the "one hop only" messages
(CER/CEA, DWR/DWA...) and is supported by ALL peers (so there is no
point in having it defined here). Application 3 is the "rudimentary
accounting functionality" defined in rfc3588(bis).

I apologize if my remark is irrelevant...

Best regards,
Sebastien.

-- 
Sebastien Decugis
Research fellow
Network Architecture Group
NICT (nict.go.jp)

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email