[Dime] DIME Status Update, July 2008 (#2)
Hannes Tschofenig <Hannes.Tschofenig@gmx.net> Wed, 23 July 2008 11:59 UTC
Return-Path: <dime-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: dime-archive@megatron.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-dime-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42EB23A6A2C; Wed, 23 Jul 2008 04:59:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: dime@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dime@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5EC43A6A22 for <dime@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 23 Jul 2008 04:59:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Bm6mlwZMGdq3 for <dime@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 23 Jul 2008 04:59:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.gmx.net (mail.gmx.net [213.165.64.20]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id F04FE3A68EA for <dime@ietf.org>; Wed, 23 Jul 2008 04:59:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 23 Jul 2008 12:00:32 -0000
Received: from unknown (EHLO [10.183.180.149]) [192.100.124.156] by mail.gmx.net (mp067) with SMTP; 23 Jul 2008 14:00:32 +0200
X-Authenticated: #29516787
X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1/+y6ZLv2z+f0iwAK2gk68O/f15Pp0A9dY9B8SFGk HXGfCA+wZIwis2
Message-ID: <48871D5F.5010002@gmx.net>
Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2008 15:00:31 +0300
From: Hannes Tschofenig <Hannes.Tschofenig@gmx.net>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.14 (Windows/20080421)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: dime@ietf.org
X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0
X-FuHaFi: 0.62
Subject: [Dime] DIME Status Update, July 2008 (#2)
X-BeenThere: dime@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Diameter Maintanence and Extentions Working Group <dime.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dime>, <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/pipermail/dime>
List-Post: <mailto:dime@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dime>, <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed"
Sender: dime-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: dime-bounces@ietf.org
I wanted to provide another status update during this month to the list based on the recent activities in the group. Here is the copy-and-paste from the webpage: http://www.tschofenig.priv.at/twiki/bin/view/Dime/DimeStatusUpdate -- RFC3588bis A working group last call on the document was started. -- Diameter Application Design Guidelines The document was updated but needs more input from the group, see my mail to the list on the 23rd of July 2008. -- Diameter API Dave has to submit a new version to reflect Dan's feedback. -- draft-ietf-dime-mip6-integrated This document is in Publication Requested state. -- draft-ietf-dime-qos-parameters This document is in Publication Requested state. -- draft-ietf-dime-qos-attributes It would be important to get more feedback on the provided draft update since the document went into WGLC for the first time. -- draft-ietf-dime-mip6-split There are two issues with this document: * I reported about the IPR aspect already some time ago, see http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dime/current/msg02579.html * The security of some of the authentication mechanisms requires special attention. I will send a mail to the group and to Jari/Pasi/Dan about this issue. -- draft-ietf-dime-diameter-qos Tolga provided a review comments and we will discuss it on the list. Dave is reading the document so that we can soon ship the updated version to the IESG. -- draft-sun-dime-itu-t-rw-00.txt The document entered IETF LC, see http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dime/current/msg02670.html -- Rechartering We are currently having a rechartering discussion based on the following proposals: * draft-asveren-dime-cong-03.txt * draft-neumann-dime-webauth * draft-stupar-dime-mos-options * draft-dondeti-dime-erp-diameter * draft-korhonen-dime-nai-routing * draft-korhonen-dime-pmip6 * draft-zorn-dime-diameter-base-protocol-mib * draft-zorn-dime-diameter-cc-appl-mib * draft-sarikaya-dimeradext-prefix-auth-ps-00.txt * draft-sarikaya-dime-prefix-delegation-ps I am not sure about draft-tsou-dime-capabilities-update-problem-statement, draft-tsou-dime-base-routing-ext, draft-mccann-dime-rfc4004bis, draft-morariu-dime-grid-accounting, draft-bodin-dime-auditing-reqs, and draft-asveren-dime-state-recovery. The authors of these documents need to tell us what they plan todo with them. _______________________________________________ DiME mailing list DiME@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dime
- [Dime] DIME Status Update, July 2008 (#2) Hannes Tschofenig