Re: [Dime] [dime] #47: reduction percentages greater than 100 should be ignored

<as a chair>

We seem to have reached a conclusion that invalid reduction percentages
should be ignored.

@ben could you update the ticket and close it?

- JOuni

On Feb 15, 2014, at 12:29 AM, Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com> wrote:

> 
> On Feb 10, 2014, at 11:58 AM, Steve Donovan <srdonovan@usdonovans.com> wrote:
> 
>> I agree that a clarification is needed on what it means to be "treated as is the OC-Validity-Duration AVP was not present".  It would e better to say:
>> 
>>  "Invalid validity duration values are given the default value".
>> 
>> 
> 
> +1.
> 
> I recognize this is different from what I said about reduction percentage. My reasoning is, if the sender includes an invalid duration, we don't know the intended duration. But since there is a default duration, we can assume it. Reduction-Percentage, however, has no such default (nor should it.). If we get an invalid reduction percentage, we really have no idea what the sender intended us to do.
> 
> 
>> 
>> Steve
>> 
>> On 2/10/14 11:29 AM, lionel.morand@orange.com wrote:
>>> Hi Steve,
>>> 
>>> About the OC-Validity-Reduction AVP values greater than 24 hours, it is said that the default value 5s applies.
>>> 
>>> I was therefore wondering if it should be also considered as an error and therefore discarded. It is a real open question. Not an issue per se as I'm fine with the existing text. I was reacting on the reason for change explained by Ben.
>>> 
>>> Regards,
>>> 
>>> Lionel
>>> 
>>> De : DiME [mailto:dime-bounces@ietf.org] De la part de Steve Donovan
>>> Envoyé : lundi 10 février 2014 17:59
>>> À : dime@ietf.org
>>> Objet : Re: [Dime] [dime] #47: reduction percentages greater than 100 should be ignored
>>> 
>>> It is possible, the range defined is zero to 24 hours.  I think the text is correct as it says that a value out of this range should be ignored.
>>> 
>>> Steve
>>> 
>>> On 2/10/14 10:50 AM, Ben Campbell wrote:
>>> 
>>> On Feb 8, 2014, at 10:37 AM, lionel.morand@orange.com wrote:
>>> 
>>> Hi Ben,
>>> 
>>> OK with this statement.
>>> But if it is agreed, would it mean that the same consideration should apply for the OC-Validity-Duration AVP values?
>>> 
>>> 
>>> I'm not sure I follow the question. Is it possible to send an invalid OC-Validity-Duration value?
>>> 
>>> Lionel
>>> 
>>> -----Message d'origine-----
>>> De : DiME [mailto:dime-bounces@ietf.org] De la part de dime issue tracker
>>> Envoyé : vendredi 7 février 2014 23:05
>>> À : draft-docdt-dime-ovli@tools.ietf.org; ben@nostrum.com
>>> Cc : dime@ietf.org
>>> Objet : [Dime] [dime] #47: reduction percentages greater than 100 should be ignored
>>> 
>>> #47: reduction percentages greater than 100 should be ignored
>>> 
>>> Section 4.7 says " [Reduction-Percentage] Values greater than 100 are
>>> interpreted as 100."
>>> 
>>> An OLR with an invalid value should be ignored. An invalid value indicates
>>> incorrect behavior on the part of the sender. In this case, it's not safe
>>> to assume we know what the sender really intended.
>>> 
>>> -- 
>>> -------------------------+-------------------------------------------------
>>> Reporter:               |      Owner:  draft-docdt-dime-
>>> ben@nostrum.com        |  ovli@tools.ietf.org
>>>    Type:  defect       |     Status:  new
>>> Priority:  minor        |  Milestone:
>>> Component:  draft-       |    Version:  1.0
>>> docdt-dime-ovli        |   Keywords:
>>> Severity:  Active WG    |
>>> Document               |
>>> -------------------------+-------------------------------------------------
>>> 
>>> Ticket URL: <http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/dime/trac/ticket/47>
>>> dime <http://tools.ietf.org/wg/dime/>
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> DiME mailing list
>>> DiME@ietf.org
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dime
>>> 
>>> _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
>>> 
>>> Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc
>>> pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler
>>> a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration,
>>> Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci.
>>> 
>>> This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law;
>>> they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation.
>>> If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments.
>>> As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified.
>>> Thank you.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> DiME mailing list
>>> DiME@ietf.org
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dime
>>> 
>>> 
>>> _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
>>> 
>>> Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc
>>> pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler
>>> a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration,
>>> Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci.
>>> 
>>> This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law;
>>> they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation.
>>> If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments.
>>> As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified.
>>> Thank you.
>>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> DiME mailing list
>> DiME@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dime
> 
> _______________________________________________
> DiME mailing list
> DiME@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dime