Re: [Dime] [dime] #47: reduction percentages greater than 100 should be ignored
Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com> Fri, 14 February 2014 22:30 UTC
Return-Path: <ben@nostrum.com>
X-Original-To: dime@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dime@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 570D11A01B4 for <dime@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 14 Feb 2014 14:30:09 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.036
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.036 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HELO_MISMATCH_COM=0.553, HOST_MISMATCH_NET=0.311] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id h2gJ0oj22hyf for <dime@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 14 Feb 2014 14:30:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: from shaman.nostrum.com (nostrum-pt.tunnel.tserv2.fmt.ipv6.he.net [IPv6:2001:470:1f03:267::2]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37FFA1A00A7 for <dime@ietf.org>; Fri, 14 Feb 2014 14:30:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [10.0.1.29] (cpe-173-172-146-58.tx.res.rr.com [173.172.146.58]) (authenticated bits=0) by shaman.nostrum.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id s1EMTuFj055196 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Fri, 14 Feb 2014 16:30:03 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from ben@nostrum.com)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.1 \(1827\))
From: Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com>
In-Reply-To: <52F91354.4090101@usdonovans.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2014 16:29:52 -0600
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <80595915-0FB5-456B-B2B6-67CC86C0B975@nostrum.com>
References: <057.6f1ee674941c8e6f852041883b135c9c@trac.tools.ietf.org> <10919_1391877435_52F65D3B_10919_16935_1_6B7134B31289DC4FAF731D844122B36E4938A3@PEXCVZYM13.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup> <A017CA7E-A26B-49A6-8C44-78EF937A6A1E@nostrum.com> <52F9056B.6010405@usdonovans.com> <10970_1392053371_52F90C7A_10970_2992_1_6B7134B31289DC4FAF731D844122B36E497E39@PEXCVZYM13.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup> <52F91354.4090101@usdonovans.com>
To: Steve Donovan <srdonovan@usdonovans.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1827)
Received-SPF: pass (shaman.nostrum.com: 173.172.146.58 is authenticated by a trusted mechanism)
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dime/QEnM0kRoXJF-8NqDaYkj9lt7Qlo
Cc: "dime@ietf.org" <dime@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Dime] [dime] #47: reduction percentages greater than 100 should be ignored
X-BeenThere: dime@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Diameter Maintanence and Extentions Working Group <dime.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dime>, <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dime/>
List-Post: <mailto:dime@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dime>, <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2014 22:30:09 -0000
On Feb 10, 2014, at 11:58 AM, Steve Donovan <srdonovan@usdonovans.com> wrote: > I agree that a clarification is needed on what it means to be "treated as is the OC-Validity-Duration AVP was not present". It would e better to say: > > "Invalid validity duration values are given the default value". > > +1. I recognize this is different from what I said about reduction percentage. My reasoning is, if the sender includes an invalid duration, we don't know the intended duration. But since there is a default duration, we can assume it. Reduction-Percentage, however, has no such default (nor should it.). If we get an invalid reduction percentage, we really have no idea what the sender intended us to do. > > Steve > > On 2/10/14 11:29 AM, lionel.morand@orange.com wrote: >> Hi Steve, >> >> About the OC-Validity-Reduction AVP values greater than 24 hours, it is said that the default value 5s applies. >> >> I was therefore wondering if it should be also considered as an error and therefore discarded. It is a real open question. Not an issue per se as I'm fine with the existing text. I was reacting on the reason for change explained by Ben. >> >> Regards, >> >> Lionel >> >> De : DiME [mailto:dime-bounces@ietf.org] De la part de Steve Donovan >> Envoyé : lundi 10 février 2014 17:59 >> À : dime@ietf.org >> Objet : Re: [Dime] [dime] #47: reduction percentages greater than 100 should be ignored >> >> It is possible, the range defined is zero to 24 hours. I think the text is correct as it says that a value out of this range should be ignored. >> >> Steve >> >> On 2/10/14 10:50 AM, Ben Campbell wrote: >> >> On Feb 8, 2014, at 10:37 AM, lionel.morand@orange.com wrote: >> >> Hi Ben, >> >> OK with this statement. >> But if it is agreed, would it mean that the same consideration should apply for the OC-Validity-Duration AVP values? >> >> >> I'm not sure I follow the question. Is it possible to send an invalid OC-Validity-Duration value? >> >> Lionel >> >> -----Message d'origine----- >> De : DiME [mailto:dime-bounces@ietf.org] De la part de dime issue tracker >> Envoyé : vendredi 7 février 2014 23:05 >> À : draft-docdt-dime-ovli@tools.ietf.org; ben@nostrum.com >> Cc : dime@ietf.org >> Objet : [Dime] [dime] #47: reduction percentages greater than 100 should be ignored >> >> #47: reduction percentages greater than 100 should be ignored >> >> Section 4.7 says " [Reduction-Percentage] Values greater than 100 are >> interpreted as 100." >> >> An OLR with an invalid value should be ignored. An invalid value indicates >> incorrect behavior on the part of the sender. In this case, it's not safe >> to assume we know what the sender really intended. >> >> -- >> -------------------------+------------------------------------------------- >> Reporter: | Owner: draft-docdt-dime- >> ben@nostrum.com | ovli@tools.ietf.org >> Type: defect | Status: new >> Priority: minor | Milestone: >> Component: draft- | Version: 1.0 >> docdt-dime-ovli | Keywords: >> Severity: Active WG | >> Document | >> -------------------------+------------------------------------------------- >> >> Ticket URL: <http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/dime/trac/ticket/47> >> dime <http://tools.ietf.org/wg/dime/> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> DiME mailing list >> DiME@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dime >> >> _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ >> >> Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc >> pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler >> a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration, >> Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci. >> >> This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law; >> they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation. >> If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments. >> As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified. >> Thank you. >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> DiME mailing list >> DiME@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dime >> >> >> _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ >> >> Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc >> pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler >> a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration, >> Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci. >> >> This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law; >> they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation. >> If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments. >> As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified. >> Thank you. >> > > _______________________________________________ > DiME mailing list > DiME@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dime
- [Dime] [dime] #47: reduction percentages greater … dime issue tracker
- Re: [Dime] [dime] #47: reduction percentages grea… lionel.morand
- Re: [Dime] [dime] #47: reduction percentages grea… Steve Donovan
- Re: [Dime] [dime] #47: reduction percentages grea… Ben Campbell
- Re: [Dime] [dime] #47: reduction percentages grea… Steve Donovan
- Re: [Dime] [dime] #47: reduction percentages grea… lionel.morand
- Re: [Dime] [dime] #47: reduction percentages grea… Steve Donovan
- Re: [Dime] [dime] #47: reduction percentages grea… Maria Cruz Bartolome
- Re: [Dime] [dime] #47: reduction percentages grea… Ben Campbell
- Re: [Dime] [dime] #47: reduction percentages grea… Jouni Korhonen
- Re: [Dime] [dime] #47 (draft-docdt-dime-ovli): re… dime issue tracker
- Re: [Dime] [dime] #47 (draft-docdt-dime-ovli): re… dime issue tracker
- Re: [Dime] [dime] #47 (draft-ietf-dime-ovli): red… dime issue tracker