[Dime] overload requirements feedback
Eric McMurry <eric.mcmurry@tekelec.com> Tue, 02 October 2012 18:47 UTC
Return-Path: <eric.mcmurry@tekelec.com>
X-Original-To: dime@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dime@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1800821F8585 for <dime@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 2 Oct 2012 11:47:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.598
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id IUe6LtNQ3s9s for <dime@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 2 Oct 2012 11:47:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from estacado.net (vicuna.estacado.net [4.30.77.35]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68E0221F8574 for <dime@ietf.org>; Tue, 2 Oct 2012 11:47:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ericlaptop.casamcmurry.com (cpe-76-184-161-215.tx.res.rr.com [76.184.161.215]) (authenticated bits=0) by estacado.net (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id q92IlWPb008014 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO) for <dime@ietf.org>; Tue, 2 Oct 2012 13:47:38 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from eric.mcmurry@tekelec.com)
From: Eric McMurry <eric.mcmurry@tekelec.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_E6F02722-5B8B-486B-BF55-74E12182B817"
Message-Id: <6E6A4865-E7A7-47C5-B747-67B7CC2F1DEE@tekelec.com>
Date: Tue, 02 Oct 2012 13:47:26 -0500
To: "dime@ietf.org" <dime@ietf.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.1 \(1498\))
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1498)
Subject: [Dime] overload requirements feedback
X-BeenThere: dime@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Diameter Maintanence and Extentions Working Group <dime.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dime>, <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dime>
List-Post: <mailto:dime@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dime>, <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Oct 2012 18:47:42 -0000
The diameter overload control requirements: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dime-overload-reqs have received some feedback on the list and everything received to date is addressed in the latest version. We are seeing significant interest on this topic and we'd like to move this along to ensure that the requirements are good, and stable, so that they are more useful for mechanism work. To that end, additional comments would be appreciated. Also, we'd like to get some dedicated reviewers though to go through this to add some additional viewpoints and thoughts. Please respond if you are able to do this. Thanks, Eric
- [Dime] overload requirements feedback Eric McMurry