Re: [Dime] Rechartering:draft-sarikaya-dimeradext-prefix-auth-ps-00.txt

Frank Xia <xiayangsong@huawei.com> Thu, 17 July 2008 18:32 UTC

Return-Path: <dime-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: dime-archive@megatron.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-dime-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 101C23A6AE8; Thu, 17 Jul 2008 11:32:05 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: dime@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dime@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BAE9D3A6AE8 for <dime@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 17 Jul 2008 11:32:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.039
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.039 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.041, BAYES_00=-2.599, J_CHICKENPOX_35=0.6, STOX_REPLY_TYPE=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9PzT9TNBG4bc for <dime@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 17 Jul 2008 11:32:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from usaga04-in.huawei.com (usaga04-in.huawei.com [206.16.17.180]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DCD243A6954 for <dime@ietf.org>; Thu, 17 Jul 2008 11:32:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from huawei.com (usaga04-in [172.18.9.16]) by usaga04-in.huawei.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 2.14 (built Aug 8 2006)) with ESMTP id <0K45008U0Y6BQ9@usaga04-in.huawei.com> for dime@ietf.org; Thu, 17 Jul 2008 13:32:35 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from X24512z ([10.124.12.92]) by usaga04-in.huawei.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 2.14 (built Aug 8 2006)) with ESMTPA id <0K4500H0NY6AA1@usaga04-in.huawei.com> for dime@ietf.org; Thu, 17 Jul 2008 13:32:35 -0500 (CDT)
Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2008 13:32:34 -0500
From: Frank Xia <xiayangsong@huawei.com>
To: Julien Bournelle <julien.bournelle@gmail.com>
Message-id: <001b01c8e83b$7b668550$5c0c7c0a@china.huawei.com>
MIME-version: 1.0
X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3198
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.3138
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-priority: Normal
References: <447547.52534.qm@web84306.mail.re1.yahoo.com> <5e2406980807170120m43f3f495veefced2d18df9f84@mail.gmail.com> <012201c8e82a$1469d610$5c0c7c0a@china.huawei.com> <5e2406980807171112h132c1b99od94dce56cfec6c86@mail.gmail.com>
Cc: dime@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Dime] Rechartering:draft-sarikaya-dimeradext-prefix-auth-ps-00.txt
X-BeenThere: dime@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Diameter Maintanence and Extentions Working Group <dime.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dime>, <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/pipermail/dime>
List-Post: <mailto:dime@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dime>, <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed"
Sender: dime-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: dime-bounces@ietf.org

Hi Julien

You'd better keep the draft
http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-korhonen-dime-pmip6-03.txt
in the current scope, and not mix with prefix delegation.

LMA prefix delegation is a separate topic which  probably
involves DHCP/RADIUS/DIAMETER  methods

BR
Frank


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Julien Bournelle" <julien.bournelle@gmail.com>
To: "Frank Xia" <xiayangsong@huawei.com>
Cc: "Glen Zorn" <glenzorn@comcast.net>; <dime@ietf.org>
Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2008 1:12 PM
Subject: Re: [Dime] 
Rechartering:draft-sarikaya-dimeradext-prefix-auth-ps-00.txt


> Hi again,
>
> On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 6:27 PM, Frank Xia <xiayangsong@huawei.com> wrote:
>> Hi Julien
>>
>> Julien wrote" We are already able to
>>  deliver Prefix during network access AAA
>> (e.g. NASREQ or EAP Diameter
>>  Application). And I may be wrong
>> but I don't see the need for a specific
>> application for this."
>>
>> The solution you refered to is tied to authentication.
>> In some scenarios, prefix delegation is independent
>> of  authentication.
>>
>> The following is a case in in proxy mobile IPv6
>> 1) MN initiates access authentication.
>>     MAG (mobile access gateway) is as the authenticator.
>> 2)MAG sends PBU(Proxy Binding Update)
>>    to LMA (Local Mobile Anchor). In this message,
>>    PBU asks for a prefix for the MN
>> 3)LMA uses Diameter for dynamical prefix requesting
>> 4)LMA sends the prefix to the MAG.
>
> For the PMIP6 case, we wrote an I-D:
>
> http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-korhonen-dime-pmip6-03.txt
>
> which hopefully should become a WG item.
>
> And as you will see, we have some exchange between LMA and AAA but right 
> before
> we have some exchanges between MAG and the AAA.
>
> So even in this case, I wouldn't say that it is only Prefix
> Delegation Authorization which
> is needed but a whole application to do AAA in the PMIPv6 case.
>
> Julien
>
>
>>
>>
>> BR
>> Frank
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Julien Bournelle" <julien.bournelle@gmail.com>
>> To: "Behcet Sarikaya" <sarikaya@ieee.org>
>> Cc: <dime@ietf.org>
>> Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2008 3:20 AM
>> Subject: Re: [Dime]
>> Rechartering:draft-sarikaya-dimeradext-prefix-auth-ps-00.txt
>>> Hi behcet,
>>>
>>> On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 5:15 PM, Behcet Sarikaya
>>> <behcetsarikaya@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>>> Hi Julien,
>>>>
>>>> ----- Original Message ----
>>>> From: Julien Bournelle <julien.bournelle@gmail.com>
>>>> To: Hannes Tschofenig <Hannes.Tschofenig@gmx.net>
>>>> Cc: dime@ietf.org
>>>> Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2008 3:14:15 AM
>>>> Subject: Re: [Dime] Rechartering:
>>>> draft-sarikaya-dimeradext-prefix-auth-ps-00.txt
>>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 8:29 PM, Hannes Tschofenig
>>>> <Hannes.Tschofenig@gmx.net> wrote:
>>>>> Document:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-sarikaya-dimeradext-prefix-auth-ps-00.txt
>>>>>
>>>>> * Who is able to be editor of the document?
>>>>>
>>>>> * Who is interested to help the editor with the work on the draft by
>>>>> co-authoring it?
>>>>>
>>>>> * Who is able to provide reviews?
>>>>>
>>>>> * Who is unable to actively help with a specific document but supports
>>>>> the
>>>>> work?
>>>>>
>>>>> * Are there concerns regarding this document?
>>>>
>>>> As I said previously in the ML. I'm not convinced by this I-D. 
>>>> Basically
>>>> I don't see the need for a specific Diameter Application for Prefix
>>>> Delegation.
>>>>
>>>> [behcet] The new draft is about Prefix Authorization. Prefix
>>>> Authorization
>>>> is well within AAA domain capabilities. Are you saying no to this?
>>>
>>> I don't want to reenter in this discussion since we already did it :)
>>>
>>> I'm not convinced by your Problem Statement. We are already able to
>>> deliver Prefix during network access AAA (e.g. NASREQ or EAP Diameter
>>> Application). And I may be wrong but I don't see the need for a specific
>>> application for this.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>>
>>> Julien
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>>
>>>> Behcet
>>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> DiME mailing list
>>> DiME@ietf.org
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dime
>>>
> 


_______________________________________________
DiME mailing list
DiME@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dime