Re: [Dime] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dime-doic-rate-control-05.txt

Hi Steve,

I'm OK with most your edits, just some extra comments from my side:

The following comment was just partially applied. There are still section
titles that are not in an upper case.
13. Upper case in section titles for section 7.3.1, 7.3.2, 7.3.3, 8.1 and
8.2
In addition to the listed ones, section 6.3 title is also under the comment.

One new comment:

Following the procedures defined in [draft-ietf-dime-doic]

Are we talking about RFC7683 here?

All in all, I'm OK with your edits, but I still have concern about the text
taken from SIP RFC.
As I noted, I think it would be better to have it reworked deeper and not
just updated with minor changes to be aligned with DOIC concept. But it
looks this is a matter of preference...

Best regards,

/Misha

2017-02-18 2:23 GMT+03:00 jouni.nospam <jouni.nospam@gmail.com>:

> Thanks Steve.
>
> - Jouni
>
> > On Feb 16, 2017, at 12:00 PM, Steve Donovan <srdonovan@usdonovans.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > All,
> >
> > I've updated the rate control draft based on comments received during
> the most recent last call.
> >
> > I've attached a diff file showing the changes.
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Steve
> >
> > On 2/16/17 1:58 PM, internet-drafts@ietf.org wrote:
> >> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts
> directories.
> >> This draft is a work item of the Diameter Maintenance and Extensions of
> the IETF.
> >>
> >>         Title           : Diameter Overload Rate Control
> >>         Authors         : Steve Donovan
> >>                           Eric Noel
> >>      Filename        : draft-ietf-dime-doic-rate-control-05.txt
> >>      Pages           : 19
> >>      Date            : 2017-02-16
> >>
> >> Abstract:
> >>    This specification documents an extension to the Diameter Overload
> >>    Indication Conveyance (DOIC) [RFC7683] base solution.  This extension
> >>    adds a new overload control abatement algorithm.  This abatement
> >>    algorithm allows for a DOIC reporting node to specify a maximum rate
> >>    at which a DOIC reacting node sends Diameter requests to the DOIC
> >>    reporting node.
> >>
> >> Requirements
> >>
> >> The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
> >> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dime-doic-rate-control/
> >>
> >> There's also a htmlized version available at:
> >> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-dime-doic-rate-control-05
> >>
> >> A diff from the previous version is available at:
> >> https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-dime-doic-rate-control-05
> >>
> >>
> >> Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of
> submission
> >> until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.
> >>
> >> Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
> >> ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> DiME mailing list
> >> DiME@ietf.org
> >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dime
> >
> > <Diff_ draft-ietf-dime-doic-rate-control-04.txt -
> draft-ietf-dime-doic-rate-control-05.txt>_______________
> ________________________________
> > DiME mailing list
> > DiME@ietf.org
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dime
>
> _______________________________________________
> DiME mailing list
> DiME@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dime
>