[Dime] draft-korhonen-dime-nai-routing-00.txt
Hannes Tschofenig <Hannes.Tschofenig@gmx.net> Fri, 04 July 2008 18:54 UTC
Return-Path: <dime-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: dime-archive@megatron.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-dime-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC4033A6918; Fri, 4 Jul 2008 11:54:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: dime@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dime@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57B653A6918 for <dime@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 4 Jul 2008 11:54:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Jyz9DqaWllmH for <dime@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 4 Jul 2008 11:54:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.gmx.net (mail.gmx.net [213.165.64.20]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id D947A3A68AB for <dime@ietf.org>; Fri, 4 Jul 2008 11:54:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 04 Jul 2008 18:54:59 -0000
Received: from a91-154-105-144.elisa-laajakaista.fi (EHLO [192.168.255.3]) [91.154.105.144] by mail.gmx.net (mp009) with SMTP; 04 Jul 2008 20:54:59 +0200
X-Authenticated: #29516787
X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX19LkFZx/vdLJHLgFkvfD4kH6WDqAYoPIxsyn2Nr6q OVvUQTfftkkOgF
Message-ID: <486E71FB.3050300@gmx.net>
Date: Fri, 04 Jul 2008 21:54:51 +0300
From: Hannes Tschofenig <Hannes.Tschofenig@gmx.net>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.14 (Windows/20080421)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: dime@ietf.org
X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0
X-FuHaFi: 0.73
Subject: [Dime] draft-korhonen-dime-nai-routing-00.txt
X-BeenThere: dime@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Diameter Maintanence and Extentions Working Group <dime.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dime>, <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/pipermail/dime>
List-Post: <mailto:dime@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dime>, <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed"
Sender: dime-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: dime-bounces@ietf.org
I am a bit surprised about this document given the discussions we had in the context of http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-tsou-dime-base-routing-ext-03. My impression was that we need to provide the text relevant to this aspect within RFC 3588bis. In fact, I naively thought that this has already been done... Without going into the details of the NAI decoration itself, which is discussed already in RFC 4282 and RFC 5113, the real content is quite short. The backwards compatibility considerations make me a bit nervous Ciao Hannes _______________________________________________ DiME mailing list DiME@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dime
- [Dime] draft-korhonen-dime-nai-routing-00.txt Hannes Tschofenig
- Re: [Dime] draft-korhonen-dime-nai-routing-00.txt Korhonen, Jouni /TeliaSonera Finland Oyj
- Re: [Dime] draft-korhonen-dime-nai-routing-00.txt Hannes Tschofenig