IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Dime] AD review of draft-ietf-dime-agent-overload-08

Steve Donovan <srdonovan@usdonovans.com> Tue, 07 February 2017 14:19 UTC

Return-Path: <srdonovan@usdonovans.com>
X-Original-To: dime@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dime@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69E51129C58 for <dime@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 7 Feb 2017 06:19:45 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.119
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.119 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_NEUTRAL=0.779, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id A0CNoMETtmaj for <dime@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 7 Feb 2017 06:19:44 -0800 (PST)
Received: from biz131.inmotionhosting.com (biz131.inmotionhosting.com [173.247.247.114]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5A833129C0B for <dime@ietf.org>; Tue, 7 Feb 2017 06:19:44 -0800 (PST)
Received: from cpe-97-99-50-102.tx.res.rr.com ([97.99.50.102]:49436 helo=Steves-MacBook-Air.local) by biz131.inmotionhosting.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256:128) (Exim 4.87) (envelope-from <srdonovan@usdonovans.com>) id 1cb6cK-000b3X-7A for dime@ietf.org; Tue, 07 Feb 2017 06:19:43 -0800
To: dime@ietf.org
References: <c7ccbd98-2475-c58d-e4dc-9a173ec6dcc7@cs.tcd.ie>
From: Steve Donovan <srdonovan@usdonovans.com>
Message-ID: <3509c910-1b9c-8d8e-b25c-b6ce0618590e@usdonovans.com>
Date: Tue, 07 Feb 2017 08:19:35 -0600
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.12; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.7.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <c7ccbd98-2475-c58d-e4dc-9a173ec6dcc7@cs.tcd.ie>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------427610AF71B1C4D3DFF24693"
X-OutGoing-Spam-Status: No, score=0.2
X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report
X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - biz131.inmotionhosting.com
X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - ietf.org
X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - usdonovans.com
X-Get-Message-Sender-Via: biz131.inmotionhosting.com: authenticated_id: srdonovan@usdonovans.com
X-Authenticated-Sender: biz131.inmotionhosting.com: srdonovan@usdonovans.com
X-Source:
X-Source-Args:
X-Source-Dir:
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dime/a1mmYpGCMOyFAiD5gNH0VzSt0Aw>
Subject: Re: [Dime] AD review of draft-ietf-dime-agent-overload-08
X-BeenThere: dime@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Diameter Maintanence and Extentions Working Group <dime.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dime>, <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dime/>
List-Post: <mailto:dime@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dime>, <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Feb 2017 14:19:45 -0000

I'm making an update to the Diamter agent draft based on comments 
received in the AD review and IETF last call.

I'll indicate updates in response to each email and then send a diff 
file with the new version of the draft.

Steve

On 1/9/17 8:21 AM, Stephen Farrell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Sorry for the delay with this - it was mis-routed to
> Katheeen's queue somehow.
>
> I've done my AD review and will start IETF LC shortly.
>
> I agree with the shepherd that the i-d nits output can be
> ignored;-)
>
> My nitty comments below can be handled as part of IETF
> LC,
>
> Cheers,
> S.
>
> - section 2: might be nice to add "Diameter agent" to this
> section. Either that or just eliminte this section if
> these terms are defined already elsewhere.
SRD> Added.
>
> - 5.1.1: OC_PEER_REPORT is very abruptly introduced.  A
> sentence to describe it or point to where it's defined
> (6.1.1 I guess) would maybe be good.
SRD> I added a reference to the OC-Feature-Vector section.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> DiME mailing list
> DiME@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dime

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email