Re: [Dime] Federated Authentication Beyond The Web: Problem Statement and Requirements
"Hannes Tschofenig" <Hannes.Tschofenig@gmx.net> Mon, 12 July 2010 11:13 UTC
Return-Path: <Hannes.Tschofenig@gmx.net>
X-Original-To: dime@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dime@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B58A3A6919 for <dime@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 12 Jul 2010 04:13:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cZk-KTZI0iss for <dime@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 12 Jul 2010 04:13:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.gmx.net (mail.gmx.net [213.165.64.20]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 3579B3A657C for <dime@ietf.org>; Mon, 12 Jul 2010 04:13:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 19538 invoked by uid 0); 12 Jul 2010 11:13:15 -0000
Received: from 62.213.134.242 by www060.gmx.net with HTTP; Mon, 12 Jul 2010 13:13:14 +0200 (CEST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2010 13:13:14 +0200
From: Hannes Tschofenig <Hannes.Tschofenig@gmx.net>
In-Reply-To: <4C3AF682.3080507@wierenga.net>
Message-ID: <20100712111314.159820@gmx.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20100706091519.251510@gmx.net> <4C330810.6010003@wierenga.net> <20100709173023.107930@gmx.net> <4C3AF682.3080507@wierenga.net>
To: Klaas Wierenga <klaas@wierenga.net>
X-Authenticated: #29516787
X-Flags: 0001
X-Mailer: WWW-Mail 6100 (Global Message Exchange)
X-Priority: 3
X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX18MJlYysWYMVt2aoFdXAdvQcb73Fj2U/wIaRbhePl 3IfRUD+i5z5L05COcJdoCM7lCr+p3T0YcxCw==
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-GMX-UID: hY1bKAdfa0A7V5IMtzAzISo/Njh6dM7q
X-FuHaFi: 0.70999999999999996
Cc: dime@ietf.org, MOONSHOT-COMMUNITY@JISCMAIL.AC.UK, radiusext@ops.ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Dime] Federated Authentication Beyond The Web: Problem Statement and Requirements
X-BeenThere: dime@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Diameter Maintanence and Extentions Working Group <dime.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dime>, <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dime>
List-Post: <mailto:dime@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dime>, <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2010 11:13:10 -0000
> My point is that I'd like the BoF to start open-minded. I believe > federated authentication for non-Web is a large and interesting area. I > would like to make sure that we don't rule out beforehand alternative > approaches. I am happy with a charter as outcome that specifies that the > WG is going to take the Moonshot approach, but imo that should be the > *result* of the BoF, not a *precondition*. I understand your thinking. I actually had the same concerns initially but a more focused discussion really helps. Additionally, nothing prevents someone else to propose another activity (either in form of a BOF, or by submitting drafts to a working group). I am quite happy with the scope of the work as being proposed. Ciao Hannes
- [Dime] Federated Authentication Beyond The Web: P… Hannes Tschofenig
- Re: [Dime] Federated Authentication Beyond The We… Hannes Tschofenig
- Re: [Dime] Federated Authentication Beyond The We… Hannes Tschofenig
- Re: [Dime] Federated Authentication Beyond The We… Klaas Wierenga
- Re: [Dime] Federated Authentication Beyond The We… Klaas Wierenga