Re: [Dime] FW: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC4072 (2317)

"Glen Zorn" <gwz@net-zen.net> Thu, 01 July 2010 07:10 UTC

Return-Path: <gwz@net-zen.net>
X-Original-To: dime@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dime@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D33C33A6887 for <dime@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 1 Jul 2010 00:10:28 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.945
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.945 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.654, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id f8GI8bd+Ccmu for <dime@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 1 Jul 2010 00:10:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from p3plsmtpa01-10.prod.phx3.secureserver.net (p3plsmtpa01-10.prod.phx3.secureserver.net [72.167.82.90]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id AEB1B3A6835 for <dime@ietf.org>; Thu, 1 Jul 2010 00:10:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 13891 invoked from network); 1 Jul 2010 07:10:38 -0000
Received: from unknown (124.157.141.182) by p3plsmtpa01-10.prod.phx3.secureserver.net (72.167.82.90) with ESMTP; 01 Jul 2010 07:10:37 -0000
From: Glen Zorn <gwz@net-zen.net>
To: "'Romascanu, Dan (Dan)'" <dromasca@avaya.com>
References: <EDC652A26FB23C4EB6384A4584434A04022F42F2@307622ANEX5.global.avaya.com>
In-Reply-To: <EDC652A26FB23C4EB6384A4584434A04022F42F2@307622ANEX5.global.avaya.com>
Date: Thu, 01 Jul 2010 14:10:29 +0700
Organization: Network Zen
Message-ID: <004801cb18ec$7f16a4d0$7d43ee70$@net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0
Thread-Index: AcsY1ige+KLIbwB9TGepu7S0z3jI5wAEZT9gAADy7wA=
Content-Language: en-us
Cc: dime@ietf.org, souheil.benayed@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [Dime] FW: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC4072 (2317)
X-BeenThere: dime@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Diameter Maintanence and Extentions Working Group <dime.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dime>, <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dime>
List-Post: <mailto:dime@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dime>, <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Jul 2010 07:10:28 -0000

Dan Romascanu [mailto://dromasca@avaya.com] writes:

> Dime WG,
> 
> Please assess this errata report.
> 
> If I understand well then Souheil's observation is that more
> Accounting-EAP-Auth-Method AVPs can be included. This seems more like a
> Technical errata, which if accepted can create interoperability problems
> with existing deployment. Am I correct?

I think that your understanding is correct, but the errata makes no sense to
me: AFAIK, only one EAP method can be used in authenticating a user (EAP
methods cannot be chained) & even if they could (as proposed for the new
tunneled EAP method under development in EMU), the structure of the Diameter
EAP app mirrors that of EAP (request/response).  Two EAP methods cannot be
operational simultaneously, so why would two method identifiers need to be
in the same Diameter message?

> 
> Thanks and Regards,
> 
> Dan
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: RFC Errata System [mailto:rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org]
> Sent: Thursday, July 01, 2010 7:31 AM
> To: pasi.eronen@nokia.com; tomhiller@lucent.com; gwz@cisco.com;
> Romascanu, Dan (Dan); rbonica@juniper.net; Bernard_Aboba@hotmail.com;
> david@mitton.com; john.loughney@nokia.com
> Cc: souheil.benayed@gmail.com; rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
> Subject: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC4072 (2317)
> 
> 
> The following errata report has been submitted for RFC4072, "Diameter
> Extensible Authentication Protocol (EAP) Application".
> 
> --------------------------------------
> You may review the report below and at:
> http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=4072&eid=2317
> 
> --------------------------------------
> Type: Editorial
> Reported by: Souheil Ben Ayed <souheil.benayed@gmail.com>
> 
> Section: 3.2.
> 
> Original Text
> -------------
>       <Diameter-EAP-Answer> ::= < Diameter Header: 268, PXY >
> 
>                                 < Session-Id >
> 
>                                 { Auth-Application-Id }
> 
>                                 { Auth-Request-Type }
> 
>                                 { Result-Code }
> 
>                                 { Origin-Host }
> 
>                                 { Origin-Realm }
> 
>                                 [ User-Name ]
> 
>                                 [ EAP-Payload ]
> 
>                                 [ EAP-Reissued-Payload ]
> 
>                                 [ EAP-Master-Session-Key ]
> 
>                                 [ EAP-Key-Name ]
> 
>                                 [ Multi-Round-Time-Out ]
> 
>                                 [ Accounting-EAP-Auth-Method ]
> 
>                                 [ Service-Type ]
> 
> Corrected Text
> --------------
>       <Diameter-EAP-Answer> ::= < Diameter Header: 268, PXY >
> 
>                                 < Session-Id >
> 
>                                 { Auth-Application-Id }
> 
>                                 { Auth-Request-Type }
> 
>                                 { Result-Code }
> 
>                                 { Origin-Host }
> 
>                                 { Origin-Realm }
> 
>                                 [ User-Name ]
> 
>                                 [ EAP-Payload ]
> 
>                                 [ EAP-Reissued-Payload ]
> 
>                                 [ EAP-Master-Session-Key ]
> 
>                                 [ EAP-Key-Name ]
> 
>                                 [ Multi-Round-Time-Out ]
> 
>                               * [ Accounting-EAP-Auth-Method ]
> 
>                                 [ Service-Type ]
> 
> Notes
> -----
> When one or more EAP methods used for authenticating the user, for each
> used EAP method an Accounting-EAP-Auth-Method AVP is added in the
> Diameter-EAP-Answer with a successful result code. In the message format
> of Diameter-EAP-Answer, one or more Accounting-EAP-Auth-Method AVPs can
> be included.
> 
> Instructions:
> -------------
> This errata is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please use
> "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or rejected. When a
> decision is reached, the verifying party (IESG) can log in to change the
> status and edit the report, if necessary.
> 
> --------------------------------------
> RFC4072 (draft-ietf-aaa-eap-10)
> --------------------------------------
> Title               : Diameter Extensible Authentication Protocol (EAP)
> Application
> Publication Date    : August 2005
> Author(s)           : P. Eronen, Ed., T. Hiller, G. Zorn
> Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
> Source              : Authentication, Authorization and Accounting
> Area                : Operations and Management
> Stream              : IETF
> Verifying Party     : IESG
> _______________________________________________
> DiME mailing list
> DiME@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dime