IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Dime] RFC 3588 - fixed positioned session-ID AVPs

"Glen Zorn" <gwz@net-zen.net> Wed, 01 September 2010 03:27 UTC

Return-Path: <gwz@net-zen.net>
X-Original-To: dime@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dime@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8B773A68E2 for <dime@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 31 Aug 2010 20:27:27 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.143
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.143 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.455, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wHQepRtA9Mm3 for <dime@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 31 Aug 2010 20:27:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtpauth03.prod.mesa1.secureserver.net (smtpauth03.prod.mesa1.secureserver.net [64.202.165.183]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id EAA953A6358 for <dime@ietf.org>; Tue, 31 Aug 2010 20:27:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 5122 invoked from network); 1 Sep 2010 03:27:53 -0000
Received: from unknown (124.157.141.122) by smtpauth03.prod.mesa1.secureserver.net (64.202.165.183) with ESMTP; 01 Sep 2010 03:27:53 -0000
From: Glen Zorn <gwz@net-zen.net>
To: 'David Lehmann' <dlehmann@ulticom.com>, 'Victor Fajardo' <vf0213@gmail.com>
References: <A51D8ACD861B7E41BFC7FE5C64BE96481167B0F1@MTLEXVS01.ulticom.com><009f01cb4913$e76b5b50$b64211f0$@net><A51D8ACD861B7E41BFC7FE5C64BE96481167B0F7@MTLEXVS01.ulticom.com><AANLkTi=GiPLzuAnLqwRe7sPGMJoRE+LTzBFdZgdCffnZ@mail.gmail.com><A51D8ACD861B7E41BFC7FE5C64BE96481167B0F9@MTLEXVS01.ulticom.com> <AANLkTiku7LqpiaRmDoB8DPndLv6JNKz_NRR0VK7sAT1E@mail.gmail.com> <A51D8ACD861B7E41BFC7FE5C64BE96481167B0FA@MTLEXVS01.ulticom.com>
In-Reply-To: <A51D8ACD861B7E41BFC7FE5C64BE96481167B0FA@MTLEXVS01.ulticom.com>
Date: Wed, 01 Sep 2010 10:27:23 +0700
Organization: Network Zen
Message-ID: <002001cb4985$99e1a110$cda4e330$@net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0021_01CB49C0.46407910"
X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0
Thread-Index: ActJOTlU5MSioJKpS2WADmXtpNTLhwAB9bdAABEV+RA=
Content-Language: en-us
Cc: dime@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Dime] RFC 3588 - fixed positioned session-ID AVPs
X-BeenThere: dime@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Diameter Maintanence and Extentions Working Group <dime.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dime>, <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dime>
List-Post: <mailto:dime@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dime>, <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Sep 2010 03:27:27 -0000

David Lehmann [mailto:dlehmann@ulticom.com] writes:
So you are stating that the Diameter protocol itself does NOT require all
session-ID AVPs to follow immediately after the message header, but a
message's BNF may require it?  

That's what the RFC says, yes.

.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email