Re: I-D Action:draft-duerst-iana-namespace-00.txt

"Randy Presuhn" <randy_presuhn@mindspring.com> Tue, 19 February 2008 18:47 UTC

Return-Path: <discuss-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-discuss-archive@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-discuss-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5B293A6A0B; Tue, 19 Feb 2008 10:47:48 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.632
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.632 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.967, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DfKLs8btXcVI; Tue, 19 Feb 2008 10:47:48 -0800 (PST)
Received: from core3.amsl.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 912AF3A683D; Tue, 19 Feb 2008 10:47:48 -0800 (PST)
X-Original-To: discuss@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: discuss@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B71293A683D for <discuss@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 19 Feb 2008 10:47:47 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xcg+1+gsz-mZ for <discuss@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 19 Feb 2008 10:47:46 -0800 (PST)
Received: from elasmtp-galgo.atl.sa.earthlink.net (elasmtp-galgo.atl.sa.earthlink.net [209.86.89.61]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3F883A679C for <discuss@apps.ietf.org>; Tue, 19 Feb 2008 10:47:46 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [66.167.78.56] (helo=oemcomputer) by elasmtp-galgo.atl.sa.earthlink.net with asmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1JRXVG-00050E-WA; Tue, 19 Feb 2008 13:47:43 -0500
Message-ID: <007b01c87328$08bab900$6801a8c0@oemcomputer>
From: "Randy Presuhn" <randy_presuhn@mindspring.com>
To: "Apps Discuss" <discuss@apps.ietf.org>
References: <6.0.0.20.2.20080218203629.058cf7c0@localhost> <048BF0AB-6FCB-411B-AD4B-726DF8B13B08@osafoundation.org> <47B9D5F5.3020808@gmx.de><9A910F0F-7930-4D84-A0A8-46FE86A6618E@mnot.net> <47BB0137.6050600@ericsson.com>
Subject: Re: I-D Action:draft-duerst-iana-namespace-00.txt
Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2008 10:48:35 -0800
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1478
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1478
X-ELNK-Trace: 4488c18417c9426da92b9037bc8bcf44d4c20f6b8d69d8885d2a9c731cc891172964707821e9e7e0608c8863977f637f350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c
X-Originating-IP: 66.167.78.56
Cc: IANA <iana@iana.org>
X-BeenThere: discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: general discussion of application-layer protocols <discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss>, <mailto:discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss>, <mailto:discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: discuss-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: discuss-bounces@ietf.org

Hi -

> From: "Balazs Lengyel" <balazs.lengyel@ericsson.com>
> To: "Mark Nottingham" <mnot@mnot.net>
> Cc: "Thomas Narten" <narten@us.ibm.com>om>; "Apps Discuss" <discuss@apps.ietf.org>rg>; "IANA" <iana@iana.org>rg>; "Tim Bray"
<Tim.Bray@Sun.COM>
> Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2008 8:17 AM
> Subject: Re: I-D Action:draft-duerst-iana-namespace-00.txt
>
> Hello,
> In Netconf we will be using quite a bit of URIs soon. IF Netconf becomes the roaring success we
> believe in :-) we will use one URI for every standard management model (kind of MIB).
...

As well as URIs (though not necessarily in our space) for every single
vendor's management models and extensions.  Depending on the
data modeling proposal, these could be either numerous or very
numerous.  In at least one modeling approach, one would likely
end up with URIs for each version of each vendor's implementations
of each "MIB", as well as their proprietary bits and pieces.

Randy