[Disman] another question about alarmMib..
Michael Thatcher <thatcher@redback.com> Mon, 15 December 2008 22:05 UTC
Return-Path: <disman-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: disman-archive@megatron.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-disman-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7EC523A6A2A; Mon, 15 Dec 2008 14:05:16 -0800 (PST)
X-Original-To: disman@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: disman@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 429983A6989 for <disman@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 15 Dec 2008 14:05:14 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.797
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.797 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.802, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NsWrD8mHSS-2 for <disman@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 15 Dec 2008 14:05:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: from prattle.redback.com (prattle.redback.com [155.53.12.9]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E57AD3A63D2 for <disman@ietf.org>; Mon, 15 Dec 2008 14:05:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by prattle.redback.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64DCC5799BC; Mon, 15 Dec 2008 14:05:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: from prattle.redback.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (prattle [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 17838-06; Mon, 15 Dec 2008 14:05:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [155.53.44.238] (nurnberg.redback.com [155.53.44.238]) by prattle.redback.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4AC935799BA; Mon, 15 Dec 2008 14:05:06 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <4946D492.5070107@redback.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 14:05:06 -0800
From: Michael Thatcher <thatcher@redback.com>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (X11/20070728)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: disman@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at redback.com
Subject: [Disman] another question about alarmMib..
X-BeenThere: disman@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Distributed Management <disman.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/disman>, <mailto:disman-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/pipermail/disman>
List-Post: <mailto:disman@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:disman-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/disman>, <mailto:disman-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: disman-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: disman-bounces@ietf.org
the alarmActiveTable is indexed by alarmListName, alarmDataAndTime, alarmActiveIndex the alarmActiveVariableTable is indexed by alarmListName, alarmActiveIndex, alarmActiveVariableIndex. How come alarmDataAndTime are not an index into the alarmActiveVariableTable, since this table by definition has the varbind objects from the corresponding entry in alarmActiveTable? This also seems to imply that alarmActiveIndex is always unique regardless of alarmDataAndTime. Is this intentional? miket
- [Disman] another question about alarmMib.. Michael Thatcher
- Re: [Disman] another question about alarmMib.. Randy Presuhn
- Re: [Disman] another question about alarmMib.. Randy Presuhn
- Re: [Disman] another question about alarmMib.. Michael Thatcher
- Re: [Disman] another question about alarmMib.. Michael Thatcher
- Re: [Disman] another question about alarmMib.. Randy Presuhn
- Re: [Disman] another question about alarmMib.. Romascanu, Dan (Dan)
- Re: [Disman] another question about alarmMib.. Randy Presuhn
- Re: [Disman] another question about alarmMib.. Sharon Chisholm