Re: [dispatch] Cutoff for charter proposals on Monday

["Richard Shockey" <[e-mail]>]

I want to add some support to this idea but for a totally different reason.
This concept breaks open the issue that there have been some in the IETF
that objected to non-routing parameters used in TEL URI's and frankly this
bizarre restriction has caused me a world of grief.

Case in point.

http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-enum-cnam-08


What I'd like to see is this issue settled once and for all. What is and is
not acceptable use of the TEL URI? 

If Calling Party Catagory is acceptable use of the TEL paramameter then I
want CNAM.  


>  -----Original Message-----
>  From: [e-mail] [mailto:[e-mail]] On
>  Behalf Of Milan Patel
>  Sent: Monday, September 21, 2009 5:35 AM
>  To: Gonzalo Camarillo; DISPATCH
>  Subject: Re: [dispatch] Cutoff for charter proposals on Monday
>  
>  Hi,
>  
>  I would like to add an additional topic to the DISPATCH charter - URI
>  parameters to describe the calling party category and toll class.
>  
>  Previously, Calling Party Category (CPC) URI parameter was defined in
>  a
>  draft by Rohan Mahy in the IPTEL group.
>  There is still a need by carriers for this parameter and it is
>  currently
>  also used within TISPAN and 3GPP.
>  The motivation for defining the CPC URI parameter is to provide a
>  standardized method of providing information about the calling party
>  and
>  the station used to originate a call. Currently, a number of
>  proprietary
>  solutions are being used as a standardized solution is unavailable.
>  
>  My intention is to revise Rohan's draft:
>  http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-mahy-iptel-cpc-06
>  And to take on board some of the comments received on the old IPTEL
>  list.
>  My proposal is to provide a draft that defines 2 URI parameters: "cpc"
>  and "oli" indicating the category and tolls class of the calling
>  party,
>  allowing mapping to parameters used in ISUP.
>  
>  Best regards,
>  Milan
>  
>  Milan Patel
>  Carrier Networks Core Standards
>  Nortel
>  [e-mail]
>  Telephone [phone] / ESN 560 2381
>  Mobile [phone] / ESN 748 9261
>  
>  For the Companies listed below, The Institute of Chartered Accountants
>  in England and Wales authorises A R Bloom, S Harris and C Hill to act
>  as
>  Insolvency Practitioners under section 390(2)(a) of the Insolvency Act
>  1986 and the Association of Chartered Certified Accountants authorises
>  A
>  M Hudson to act as an Insolvency Practitioner under section 390(2)(a)
>  of
>  the Insolvency Act 1986.
>  
>  The affairs, business and property of the Companies are being managed
>  by
>  the Joint Administrators, A R Bloom, S Harris, AM Hudson and C Hill
>  who
>  act as agents of the Companies only and without personal liability.
>  
>  The Companies are Nortel Networks UK Limited; Nortel Networks SA;
>  Nortel
>  GmbH; Nortel Networks France SAS; Nortel Networks NV; Nortel Networks
>  SpA; Nortel Networks BV; Nortel Networks Polska SP Zoo; Nortel
>  Networks
>  Hispania SA; Nortel Networks (Austria) GmbH; Nortel Networks sro;
>  Nortel
>  Networks Engineering Service Kft; Nortel Networks Portugal SA; Nortel
>  Networks Slovensko sro; Nortel Networks Oy; Nortel Networks Romania
>  SRL;
>  Nortel Networks AB; Nortel Networks International Finance & Holding BV
>  -----Original Message-----
>  From: [e-mail] [mailto:[e-mail]] On
>  Behalf Of Gonzalo Camarillo
>  Sent: 16 September 2009 15:13
>  To: DISPATCH
>  Subject: [dispatch] Cutoff for charter proposals on Monday
>  
>  Folks,
>  
>  this is a reminder of our cutoff for charter proposals, which is on
>  Monday (September 21st). Per our previous email: "A charter proposal
>  must consist of a minimum of a problem statement and at least one
>  milestone/deliverable. This deadline will allow time for consideration
>  of proposals that could potentially be "dispatched" prior to the WG
>  session."
>  
>  A few of the topics we received arrived after the previous deadline,
>  which was September 7th. We will be considering even those topics that
>  arrived a bit late because we realize the deadline was quite tough to
>  meet (specially for people that returned from their vacation right
>  before the deadline).
>  
>  We are expecting charter proposals for:
>  
>  o Third-party authorization
>  o CBUS
>  o Session recording
>  o Identity
>  o Disaggregated media
>  o Domain registrations in SIP
>  o SIP - XMPP
>  o Alert-info URNs
>  o Reference to an earlier communication
>  
>  Let the chairs know if there are topics missing from this list.
>  
>  Thanks,
>  
>  Gonzalo
>  DISPATCH co-chair
>  _______________________________________________
>  dispatch mailing list
>  [e-mail]
>  https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dispatch
>  _______________________________________________
>  dispatch mailing list
>  [e-mail]
>  https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dispatch