Re: [dispatch] Summary Notes on dispatch IETF88 meeting

[Mary Barnes <[e-mail]>]

We should also clarify that whether MMUSIC will actually charter this as a
work item is up to the MMUSIC WG.  So, the dispatching means explicitly
that if the RAI/IETF is going to do this work item, it should be done in
the MMUSIC WG.

Mary.


On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 6:51 PM, Cullen Jennings (fluffy)
<[e-mail]>wrote:

>
> On Nov 5, 2013, at 5:12 PM, Cullen Jennings (fluffy) <[e-mail]>
> wrote:
>
> >
> > Many thanks to note takers: Dan Romascanu & Jean Mahoney
> >
> > Action for chairs: post a note saying we will post
> draft-dawes-dispatch-mediasec-parameter to sip core. This has ben done
> >
> >
> >
> > On the topic of external SDP negotiation for Data Channel. For both the
> drafts
> >
> > draft-ejzak-dispatch-msrp-data-channel-00.txt
> > draft-ejzak-dispatch-webrtc-data-channel-sdpneg-00.txt
> >
> > Strong consensus on the following statement "Unfortunately, this needs
> to be dispatch to the mmusic WG."
> >
>
> I got a question to clarify "Unfortunately".
>
> This came up in the meeting in the context that the mmusic WG is very busy
> right now. This means this draft will be competing for time in that WG with
> several other drafts. Someone suggested that was unfortunate and it got
> included in the HUM question but I don't think it necessarily reflected the
> opinion of the WG one way or the other. The key thing was this work needs
> to go mmusic.
>
> Cullen
>
>