Re: [dispatch] Summary Notes on dispatch IETF88 meeting

"Cullen Jennings (fluffy)" <fluffy@cisco.com> Thu, 07 November 2013 00:52 UTC

Return-Path: <fluffy@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: dispatch@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dispatch@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1494821F9E44 for <dispatch@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 6 Nov 2013 16:52:05 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -110.566
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-110.566 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.033, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id RPryl3L88iya for <dispatch@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 6 Nov 2013 16:51:59 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rcdn-iport-2.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-2.cisco.com [173.37.86.73]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B964421F9E43 for <dispatch@ietf.org>; Wed, 6 Nov 2013 16:51:58 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1102; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1383785518; x=1384995118; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-id:content-transfer-encoding: mime-version; bh=dv/moCsSjMKDuWNYfULU2IqI8Gy39L7OMiQ7G1dmRKM=; b=my4kVlAru2+2anmhBe2YG6VC/RUeKnrjKCpuleiRcln/KQf9ny5HB/WO ZqBI2t8aA3fqy60hsA/ce2ewa+PyO4ZbT1gfFCF83DYT/6GEb1jLO5+zs MBLCoBe/ageVmjvnlw3Ql+XLblLz2u42VHg2j5w+YWXIO1RiAd9paj7uE E=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Ag4FAErjelKtJXG8/2dsb2JhbABbgweBC78ugSkWdIIlAQEBAwE6PxACAQg2EDIlAgQOBYd7Br8SjyYzB4MggRADmAySCoMmgio
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.93,647,1378857600"; d="scan'208";a="281661377"
Received: from rcdn-core2-1.cisco.com ([173.37.113.188]) by rcdn-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP; 07 Nov 2013 00:51:58 +0000
Received: from xhc-rcd-x01.cisco.com (xhc-rcd-x01.cisco.com [173.37.183.75]) by rcdn-core2-1.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id rA70pwif017639 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Thu, 7 Nov 2013 00:51:58 GMT
Received: from xmb-aln-x02.cisco.com ([169.254.5.229]) by xhc-rcd-x01.cisco.com ([173.37.183.75]) with mapi id 14.03.0123.003; Wed, 6 Nov 2013 18:51:57 -0600
From: "Cullen Jennings (fluffy)" <fluffy@cisco.com>
To: "dispatch@ietf.org list" <dispatch@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Summary Notes on dispatch IETF88 meeting
Thread-Index: AQHO2o1FtKG2u64ZAEOHFFRjxHH5gZoZV16A
Date: Thu, 07 Nov 2013 00:51:57 +0000
Message-ID: <F42F52FB-30B4-4C16-8B29-BB11E5414ADC@cisco.com>
References: <AD608B17-8A10-45C9-B233-A71299303024@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <AD608B17-8A10-45C9-B233-A71299303024@cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.21.116.13]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <B10E54BE9F2478478DC684E7A0333356@emea.cisco.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [dispatch] Summary Notes on dispatch IETF88 meeting
X-BeenThere: dispatch@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: DISPATCH Working Group Mail List <dispatch.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dispatch>, <mailto:dispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dispatch>
List-Post: <mailto:dispatch@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dispatch>, <mailto:dispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Nov 2013 00:52:05 -0000

On Nov 5, 2013, at 5:12 PM, Cullen Jennings (fluffy) <fluffy@cisco.com> wrote:

> 
> Many thanks to note takers: Dan Romascanu & Jean Mahoney
> 
> Action for chairs: post a note saying we will post draft-dawes-dispatch-mediasec-parameter to sip core. This has ben done 
> 
> 
> 
> On the topic of external SDP negotiation for Data Channel. For both the drafts 
> 
> draft-ejzak-dispatch-msrp-data-channel-00.txt
> draft-ejzak-dispatch-webrtc-data-channel-sdpneg-00.txt
> 
> Strong consensus on the following statement "Unfortunately, this needs to be dispatch to the mmusic WG."
> 

I got a question to clarify "Unfortunately". 

This came up in the meeting in the context that the mmusic WG is very busy right now. This means this draft will be competing for time in that WG with several other drafts. Someone suggested that was unfortunate and it got included in the HUM question but I don't think it necessarily reflected the opinion of the WG one way or the other. The key thing was this work needs to go mmusic.  

Cullen