IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dispatch] [Sframe] Dispatch of SFrame

Sergio Garcia Murillo <sergio.garcia.murillo@gmail.com> Tue, 16 June 2020 14:35 UTC

Return-Path: <sergio.garcia.murillo@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dispatch@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dispatch@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 538A33A163A for <dispatch@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 16 Jun 2020 07:35:59 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id IYm290zNCDKS for <dispatch@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 16 Jun 2020 07:35:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wm1-x32d.google.com (mail-wm1-x32d.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::32d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 04C353A16C0 for <dispatch@ietf.org>; Tue, 16 Jun 2020 07:35:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wm1-x32d.google.com with SMTP id l17so3122820wmj.0 for <dispatch@ietf.org>; Tue, 16 Jun 2020 07:35:08 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=9dOau02OZWjIwl+IO35+U2Dz7mFHwPwcSdIJ9Gby4WQ=; b=EnHjb/Fxb1079IevF6Y9avdVvjF+yZoA5xhueCnZuJSM/S2bSFfYzkoBdMGwffhUBd 8ycpUDYZ7OMZdgoTdC4/VD/QyCDW0IvYsXQ+dTldlaU39XVHJa74LlpiideZWGocOstk RtN4RQbI+IhtyYrqm2z9cyUDxgXMTpfzmEYu5CPmganYkXF/uUkb2PvT3Od1o6hCwdDl mWwbVRYPXDHqRebCmR8bucBIhQZo0HpOrQqVkWcFg+qHKtLQ8qbsfJTKotqekMKetW0O 6U0KxCuNNpAE4mGLfB6Y/iULnrW8y4/z1wuM2xpLAn/FxB7/aMJoMN7pAe+OnpuYxaoZ o5ww==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=9dOau02OZWjIwl+IO35+U2Dz7mFHwPwcSdIJ9Gby4WQ=; b=oWDqoz07VIyAGEynab43oUXGVw1mthvt+thYBDYshGvRODvxix+KeBr0u/+Px0HsLj Q7tWluNqrdRfxzckPxyaGJzHoIC99mQsVz5rnarzHLW3Hh8k5h4+562UIDm/RAMqViri uwOhRoqj4HfDhedLZra9OvCOLgGvgjwXDMj0IwFatkU7NJZcKmNNip8MVtZUWXy4AYio 8Psjr2YnBxahiB8pbUi8IzvMIzGe065VwfUyPxcfOTqCoiPpeZPufO/X0EKM3uxuNoaf 53Kel+1B1Ki3YXZshqHka+Hzf3BtipXfqdPNWbTgiX8CzFjsFZvx9EkYL2nbaJCWknU6 gZjQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530FM1v42FAqEMK39ZWcPE0a56P7QMc/DmMG06cgYVQLnO3olP08 amno6PIaq1UO9wiaZPdnDiiX6uEz7Kc9PriHlF4=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyu4Kec5oX0uAsAFf6L1+Wy34AYQqYdi3lHA5BBkooon/zeqkZ8tPSfpvF8ALaNQvFH8PNqHciau3I2tdlLrRM=
X-Received: by 2002:a1c:2082:: with SMTP id g124mr3689170wmg.21.1592318107391; Tue, 16 Jun 2020 07:35:07 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CABcZeBOWU8G1p7zKYmUh+13+ZDgpuzgN737aJTNOfsdFTbKQxQ@mail.gmail.com> <355B2449-D396-4528-896B-CA2ED630ED35@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <355B2449-D396-4528-896B-CA2ED630ED35@gmail.com>
From: Sergio Garcia Murillo <sergio.garcia.murillo@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2020 16:34:56 +0200
Message-ID: <CA+ag07bfeKHJiqhRn7Kt38b03NggpfOo_eRtE7igo8=4pJ_mDg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Bernard Aboba <bernard.aboba@gmail.com>
Cc: Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>, DISPATCH list <dispatch@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000291e9f05a83473bd"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dispatch/9S2tjW5BblpjBOWmwKLvox50Rs4>
Subject: Re: [dispatch] [Sframe] Dispatch of SFrame
X-BeenThere: dispatch@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: DISPATCH Working Group Mail List <dispatch.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dispatch>, <mailto:dispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dispatch/>
List-Post: <mailto:dispatch@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dispatch>, <mailto:dispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2020 14:35:59 -0000

El mar., 16 jun. 2020 16:27, Bernard Aboba <bernard.aboba@gmail.com>
escribió:

> On Jun 16, 2020, at 6:53 AM, Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com> wrote:
> >
> > Yes, I understand that the wire encoding supports signatures, but in the
> discussions I've had (including with Emac) I don't think that people
> believe that the latency/bandwidth/computation tradeoff is viable.
>
> [BA] Depends on the scenario.  We are in a pandemic where conferences are
> being used for all kinds of things that we haven’t seen before. For
> example, consider a situation in which participants are answering a binding
> poll and the responses (voice or data) need to be authenticated. SFrame can
> handle that. PERC cannot.


The good thing is, as I said before, I have already implemented it in my js
lib. I will add some stats and run some tests with different policies and
provide feedback about added overhead and encryption times.

Anyway, as Bernard says, it is a trade off, and some people may be willing
to pay for it based on their use case.

Best regards
Sergio

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email