Re: [dispatch] Proposed charter for DCRUP v0.3

"John R Levine" <johnl@taugh.com> Fri, 07 April 2017 16:51 UTC

Return-Path: <johnl@taugh.com>
X-Original-To: dispatch@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dispatch@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6986A12952E for <dispatch@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 7 Apr 2017 09:51:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1536-bit key) header.d=iecc.com header.b=ZHp3v/Uy; dkim=pass (1536-bit key) header.d=taugh.com header.b=f+K0vQ5M
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id X915p8Ia8TaD for <dispatch@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 7 Apr 2017 09:51:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from miucha.iecc.com (abusenet-1-pt.tunnel.tserv4.nyc4.ipv6.he.net [IPv6:2001:470:1f06:1126::2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 76973129528 for <dispatch@ietf.org>; Fri, 7 Apr 2017 09:51:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 3987 invoked from network); 7 Apr 2017 16:51:47 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=iecc.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type:user-agent; s=f76.58e7c3a3.k1704; bh=bGCpdpetg98FprFzZOi3Jwcj9xOEoCPV0CxBD/oNwF4=; b=ZHp3v/Uyvw+HeBHnLA7vsOJ3yGaGdkoLqv1hfNuK2Cee/qAWHG/6PmBppqwSzRdjo5vWgPkmCSXzuEpUpsxHfYV4Hl8gdI9l8S/5MzuaIU2thsR2XZWMV4XgHFv9T6yotpiGhVAsYpdOJT2SPuVNZJjh6lUgw7vcygdtvw09n72kFH/Oh0PZo0JgNI6KLZ5nPCVMGbLAAfTFB1ORXg9BIM3e6j2sL13IdhNXcqTxNh/acTwU2kjf7YC0FUdfPlbs
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=taugh.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type:user-agent; s=f76.58e7c3a3.k1704; bh=bGCpdpetg98FprFzZOi3Jwcj9xOEoCPV0CxBD/oNwF4=; b=f+K0vQ5MnAa924MlR3PSepgXStHz90EId9hU7vOUwYDM/ng68Bw5IIt5GpwP8Aj5o1UHGpUcAKsr5wN8DSHQ7LiQtd/zPTUxHnhwas5wWmBYbYMymPykuekyhbZoI3fN1nAHHW11bNnJ7YNekHWElgd0kRBQ9CSC3mxT8HMGgB2b6JAmca2ueV6MjziZaSWoXQ/Skd7m2mHMsL37VXdzuvPjizfJ4lM63QZN/3bcavcYFQjW5kdG/YSW/tTxxGIN
Received: from localhost ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) by imap.iecc.com ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) with ESMTPS (TLS1.2/X.509/AEAD) via TCP6; 07 Apr 2017 16:51:37 -0000
Date: Fri, 07 Apr 2017 12:51:36 -0400
Message-ID: <alpine.OSX.2.20.1704071250510.55219@ary.qy>
From: John R Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
To: Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>
Cc: DISPATCH list <dispatch@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <CABcZeBMw+S-O-gX4Yhse+WRQNeV3rR-W4nLCb8KdNf+oBiyMaA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <alpine.OSX.2.20.1703271129060.7578@dhcp-80f1.meeting.ietf.org> <CAL0qLwZ9pDcOsooOgrpN9feDywc-+=twNtN4BpvOQ6ny68yLfA@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.OSX.2.20.1703301431530.8232@dhcp-80f1.meeting.ietf.org> <alpine.OSX.2.20.1704071233050.55219@ary.qy> <CABcZeBMw+S-O-gX4Yhse+WRQNeV3rR-W4nLCb8KdNf+oBiyMaA@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.20 (OSX 67 2015-01-07)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dispatch/JPqSh6rwk3yxE-vqh18J-fHF-gA>
Subject: Re: [dispatch] Proposed charter for DCRUP v0.3
X-BeenThere: dispatch@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: DISPATCH Working Group Mail List <dispatch.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dispatch>, <mailto:dispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dispatch/>
List-Post: <mailto:dispatch@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dispatch>, <mailto:dispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Apr 2017 16:51:55 -0000

>> hash of the key in the DNS.  It will limit itself to existing implemented
>> algorithms and key forms.
>
> Can you clarify "implemented" here? Do you just mean "in wide use by IETF
> or otherwise"?

That's essentially what I had in mind.  Freely available high quality 
imeplmentations would be nice.

Regards,
John Levine, johnl@taugh.com, Taughannock Networks, Trumansburg NY
Please consider the environment before reading this e-mail. https://jl.ly