[dispatch] RFC 3680 extensibility
Christer Holmberg <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com> Fri, 11 June 2010 11:03 UTC
Return-Path: <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>
X-Original-To: dispatch@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dispatch@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6DEB33A695B for <dispatch@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 11 Jun 2010 04:03:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.026
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.026 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-1.287, BAYES_20=-0.74, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id sYiGyC+ahtQq for <dispatch@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 11 Jun 2010 04:03:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailgw9.se.ericsson.net (mailgw9.se.ericsson.net [193.180.251.57]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 494F53A6959 for <dispatch@ietf.org>; Fri, 11 Jun 2010 04:03:18 -0700 (PDT)
X-AuditID: c1b4fb39-b7b80ae000001aa1-6c-4c1217f647e0
Received: from esessmw0237.eemea.ericsson.se (Unknown_Domain [153.88.253.125]) by mailgw9.se.ericsson.net (Symantec Mail Security) with SMTP id 33.6B.06817.6F7121C4; Fri, 11 Jun 2010 13:03:19 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from ESESSCMS0354.eemea.ericsson.se ([169.254.2.84]) by esessmw0237.eemea.ericsson.se ([153.88.115.90]) with mapi; Fri, 11 Jun 2010 13:03:16 +0200
From: Christer Holmberg <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>
To: DISPATCH list <dispatch@ietf.org>
Date: Fri, 11 Jun 2010 13:03:15 +0200
Thread-Topic: RFC 3680 extensibility
Thread-Index: AcsJVbEf5CP1frgBQTGyiKiXjhpJ0w==
Message-ID: <FF84A09F50A6DC48ACB6714F4666CC7465C6398042@ESESSCMS0354.eemea.ericsson.se>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_FF84A09F50A6DC48ACB6714F4666CC7465C6398042ESESSCMS0354e_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAA==
Subject: [dispatch] RFC 3680 extensibility
X-BeenThere: dispatch@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: DISPATCH Working Group Mail List <dispatch.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dispatch>, <mailto:dispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dispatch>
List-Post: <mailto:dispatch@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dispatch>, <mailto:dispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 11 Jun 2010 11:03:19 -0000
Hi, Section 5.1 of RFC 3680 (reg event package) says: "Other elements from different namespaces MAY be present for the purposes of extensibility; elements or attributes from unknown namespaces MUST be ignored." However, there is no policy regarding whether the definition of these "other namespaces" needs to be done in IETF - only that they must be ignored if not supported. 3GPP has been discussing a couple of IMS specific cases, in which such extension elements/attributes could be used as solution (no decissions have been made yet), so the question is whether it would require IETF work. Regards, Christer
- [dispatch] RFC 3680 extensibility Christer Holmberg
- Re: [dispatch] RFC 3680 extensibility WORLEY, Dale R (Dale)
- Re: [dispatch] RFC 3680 extensibility Gonzalo Camarillo
- Re: [dispatch] RFC 3680 extensibility Andrew Allen
- Re: [dispatch] RFC 3680 extensibility Christer Holmberg