Re: [dispatch] Email ettiquette

Emil Ivov <emcho@jitsi.org> Thu, 13 February 2014 11:45 UTC

Return-Path: <emcho@sip-communicator.org>
X-Original-To: dispatch@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dispatch@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7DE51A01E8 for <dispatch@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 13 Feb 2014 03:45:47 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.979
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.979 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cKcg8utEGzHy for <dispatch@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 13 Feb 2014 03:45:46 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ve0-f181.google.com (mail-ve0-f181.google.com [209.85.128.181]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4FC21A01B4 for <dispatch@ietf.org>; Thu, 13 Feb 2014 03:45:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ve0-f181.google.com with SMTP id cz12so8517084veb.12 for <dispatch@ietf.org>; Thu, 13 Feb 2014 03:45:44 -0800 (PST)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=VaPyRtrMoA4H9VH82pFbQn1NOgkU42XXUH31X0rdrXo=; b=B6x0pLQy+ZQushxGJbicDchY1T0nXuVIWU+i3X7uDbKUfcWwhB+hxOm9TCYjCBl/2n L4KTSnecBLLhezQOzdtkwJBw5jQqh36wvFcA5OZ/J4sWHsUNQ3td394g53rVtd2AmOE2 1K3LAkfTvdtDG2sdZO67NHdctMTLWGkJKI/agQHZFJJ159P7L2WumkV4uDPQOuZfACo4 7WCbOOIvPMsq/D9XRVZFSIqWHoXENSKkkdgKvBwoFxWgmAay5qk4rMKQteosVOL0h/mu dQGe4Sl7m0swj+OQa/oKBkr/rL4pjbRPQPQzk5Ihii3cUkJzr3O17YuOyAbCq7p0Qji+ OVqA==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmBCl3tKc50XJrffNT+xSer/BhrOXRUg4c676ejvCadWy4sIi5stog/bPtrjXfQDetKBsWW
X-Received: by 10.52.251.232 with SMTP id zn8mr182755vdc.41.1392291944376; Thu, 13 Feb 2014 03:45:44 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-vc0-f172.google.com (mail-vc0-f172.google.com [209.85.220.172]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id x1sm2380749veb.5.2014.02.13.03.45.44 for <dispatch@ietf.org> (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Thu, 13 Feb 2014 03:45:44 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-vc0-f172.google.com with SMTP id lf12so8189637vcb.3 for <dispatch@ietf.org>; Thu, 13 Feb 2014 03:45:43 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 10.58.188.78 with SMTP id fy14mr643511vec.23.1392291943928; Thu, 13 Feb 2014 03:45:43 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.220.191.130 with HTTP; Thu, 13 Feb 2014 03:45:23 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <A396A211-5ED4-4754-BD4D-FA84389F40B6@westhawk.co.uk>
References: <A396A211-5ED4-4754-BD4D-FA84389F40B6@westhawk.co.uk>
From: Emil Ivov <emcho@jitsi.org>
Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2014 12:45:23 +0100
Message-ID: <CAPvvaaLUXBjwKzugxu4c02CXr_FjSs74Buo1DmHM3dybnGwDig@mail.gmail.com>
To: Tim Panton new <thp@westhawk.co.uk>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Cc: "dispatch@ietf.org" <dispatch@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [dispatch] Email ettiquette
X-BeenThere: dispatch@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: DISPATCH Working Group Mail List <dispatch.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dispatch>, <mailto:dispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dispatch/>
List-Post: <mailto:dispatch@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dispatch>, <mailto:dispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2014 11:45:48 -0000

Or, instead of ignoring, responders could start their replies with a
disclaimer that expressly
forbids reading the rest.

On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 12:06 PM, Tim Panton new <thp@westhawk.co.uk> wrote:
> If ( hypothetically ) an email were to be sent to this list containing a disclaimer expressly forbidding a reply or disclosure, would
> it be concidered impolite to ignore it?
>
> Tim.

-- 
https://jitsi.org