[dispatch] Cutoff for 110?
Martin Thomson <mt@lowentropy.net> Mon, 18 January 2021 03:55 UTC
Return-Path: <mt@lowentropy.net>
X-Original-To: dispatch@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dispatch@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E7A33A0CD5 for <dispatch@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 17 Jan 2021 19:55:33 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.101
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.101 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lowentropy.net header.b=lDTctgYN; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.b=QX+yKfJO
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id z6SkKy9YhCVq for <dispatch@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 17 Jan 2021 19:55:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: from wout5-smtp.messagingengine.com (wout5-smtp.messagingengine.com [64.147.123.21]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8CB8B3A0CC0 for <dispatch@ietf.org>; Sun, 17 Jan 2021 19:55:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.nyi.internal [10.202.2.41]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06E471521 for <dispatch@ietf.org>; Sun, 17 Jan 2021 22:55:28 -0500 (EST)
Received: from imap10 ([10.202.2.60]) by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Sun, 17 Jan 2021 22:55:29 -0500
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lowentropy.net; h=mime-version:message-id:date:from:to:subject:content-type; s= fm1; bh=DzlBHcuLTxoE5B+ttl+F4DSemoHwyFq0ObqQt5ngajU=; b=lDTctgYN HbYih8A7oLlvvzOLs3d0owfJYJ5dZGDs3j2LRVcdZXJZ5tZkR7YLHpwjhCAMs1DF Ax5AbEU4a7hH5fX3+v0Ze3s5qZKxDuHJj5SQ5PUzON/E96zrD3Jn9QyCph/JPHyY UVu+dj+smV8QlGNQWNZtN1PGWcSazFJAGhpk1edOqWVCLxMLymQUTrbvZ+8u/miT lVdlXgZj88Rilc+bUzbI6IEnaww7KG9emII80vFTG6mY3kvmxQHPnxZi8RI3I1hm cBPCYhPH3WBA12ejhwiP7ItV3oowVOYUj05z+G1iAE3YCH1oXn1NmQHQn7yZnJWR McywfHWErrtGJg==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=content-type:date:from:message-id :mime-version:subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender :x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=DzlBHcuLTxoE5B+ttl+F4DSemoHwy Fq0ObqQt5ngajU=; b=QX+yKfJO+t5uQs3RlwbVJqMDGm1YUaI19YwlJkrVrLL1N zYTC/FDBnfQh13VHbhelsq7KuHGuyt2i/39JF7ZL2R2T6Q6aQV9zNLnb0LF34HA8 6Sk6B13wGT8tTTVuv6yQT6nCAo/eemLDTPlYS9e/I/TpPL1OGv3T/7uZ0Mys5u0/ lIH4bINit7Ugu1gRQk/u2U5Y+4vk6yo019uR2gTHiCjIGl/oZPWb0w6jydi3jqNd PJBTKlr5AUxmG0U4nJJdTTV6BSLYOwoLub/8HKBlOiqnSpVb7yKeqjs5a/AYbQdr m6gTt82BvXiweg29NrlRWOuzyXWJpwKmN5hB65rsQ==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:sAYFYCFTehU4fZB6r2fDpSKK8rXTBVis8kQBZ3YP0IiIGw_SL5nrPw> <xme:sAYFYDUnJ5RaHUqhThteaRKxva1_NiJjgQDLRAjHyVypJGnwAw2GKcFBORGDTtfQO jjJk8dYOdxYHNdk8x0>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduledrtdejgdeigecutefuodetggdotefrodftvf curfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecu uegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecunecujfgurhepofgfggfkfffhvffutgesthdtredtre ertdenucfhrhhomhepfdforghrthhinhcuvfhhohhmshhonhdfuceomhhtsehlohifvghn thhrohhphidrnhgvtheqnecuggftrfgrthhtvghrnhepvefguddtgfejfeduueehkeehke duueegheefgeevkeekgeelveevffeuudffheehnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptden ucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepmhhtsehlohifvghnthhrohhphidrnhgvth
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:sAYFYMKnIVSmrQN6DuvMyz7uM9lWd4Kfcn_xFdp4XLepP_uC9mtGGQ> <xmx:sAYFYMElyDYrQIXM8iCniOsOQu371pDnkLzKeC-zxn4T4JkvaBwmPg> <xmx:sAYFYIU9U41IK48_VZhF_MHJgmOsDqIxBO42eRLFYMNNCMU8xz84sw> <xmx:sAYFYAihe82cVN89ZbShBG6suO3RLZ8qKHcv1gO2tWIkI-gYp2v2GA>
Received: by mailuser.nyi.internal (Postfix, from userid 501) id 2F5CA200C5; Sun, 17 Jan 2021 22:55:28 -0500 (EST)
X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface
User-Agent: Cyrus-JMAP/3.5.0-alpha0-45-g4839256-fm-20210104.001-g48392560
Mime-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <56b88e14-1bb2-4e9c-8439-2721169ba29b@www.fastmail.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Jan 2021 14:55:09 +1100
From: Martin Thomson <mt@lowentropy.net>
To: dispatch@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dispatch/MMFknk5iHcunimZiaSwY6Au-anI>
Subject: [dispatch] Cutoff for 110?
X-BeenThere: dispatch@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: DISPATCH Working Group Mail List <dispatch.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dispatch>, <mailto:dispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dispatch/>
List-Post: <mailto:dispatch@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dispatch>, <mailto:dispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 18 Jan 2021 03:55:34 -0000
I'm looking at the wiki and its very much out of date. Based on the one example of the dates in the Wiki, the dates might have passed already, but I haven't seen any notices to the list. Where are we at? (Answer to the obvious question: I'm working on something with others, but it's not quite ready yet.)
- [dispatch] Cutoff for 110? Martin Thomson
- Re: [dispatch] Cutoff for 110? Mary Barnes
- Re: [dispatch] Cutoff for 110? Ira McDonald
- Re: [dispatch] Cutoff for 110? Mark Nottingham
- Re: [dispatch] Cutoff for 110? Patrick McManus