Re: [dispatch] DISPATCH @ IETF-87 Deadlines

On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 5:29 AM, Dawes, Peter, Vodafone Group
<Peter.Dawes@vodafone.com> wrote:
> Hello Mary,
> I would like the dispatch working group to consider two drafts at IETF-87 as follows:
>
> 1) http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-dawes-dispatch-logme-reqs-02.txt
> This draft was discussed at IETF-86 and has been updated with potential solutions to requirements (clause 7). I would like to propose that INSIPID adopt this work.
> (from IETF-86 http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/dispatch/trac/wiki#)
> •Logging: General support for adopting this work. Proposal to update INSIPID WG with a new deliverable.
>         ◦Charter: http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dispatch/current/msg04560.html
>         ◦Related documents:
>                 ■draft-dawes-dispatch-logme-reqs
[MB] Per the above, we dispatched that document at IETF-86 with the
recommendation that it be handled in the INSIPID WG. We saw no
concerns over that expressed on this mailing list post-IETF-86.  My
recommendation is that the discussion of this document (and whether a
new deliverable should be added to the INSIPID WG charter) should move
to the INISIPID WG mailing list. [/MB]
>
> 2) http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-dawes-dispatch-mediasec-parameter-06.txt
> An informational RFC describing a header field parameter to distinguish security mechanisms that protect media (as opposed to those that protect signalling) between a UA and its first-hop SIP entity, and to create an IANA registry to list names of such media-specific security mechanisms.
[MB] At this point, it's not clear as to exactly why this is required
and why this needs to be in a SIP header field parameter as opposed to
SDP, for example.  Again, we need clear problem statements as opposed
to specific solutions for discussion. Since this appears to be based
on 3GPP requirements, Gonzalo will follow-up with you all to get more
details in that regards to further inform the DISPATCH chairs & ADs
decision. [/MB]
>
> Regards,
> Peter
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: dispatch-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:dispatch-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Mary Barnes
> Sent: 18 June 2013 23:05
> To: DISPATCH
> Cc: Cullen Jennings
> Subject: [dispatch] DISPATCH @ IETF-87 Deadlines
>
> As a reminder, the deadline for letting the chairs know that you are planning to submit something for consideration for the IETF-87
> deadline is June 24th, 2013 (next Monday - 6 days time).   The
> subsequent deadlines are also in the wiki:
> http://tools.ietf.org/wg/dispatch/trac/wiki
> Noting, that the draft deadlines are the same as the IETF draft deadlines.
>
> Regards,
> Mary
> DISPATCH WG co-chair
> _______________________________________________
> dispatch mailing list
> dispatch@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dispatch