Re: [dispatch] DISPATCH @ IETF-87 Deadlines

Peter,

I'm fine with discussing this in dispatch.

My main concern with this is around REQ9 - locator of log collector server:

- how is the log collector designated? The examples show just a dns 
name. I would think it would need to be a URL. But what protocol would 
be used to transfer the log? Is it required that those supporting log-me 
also support specific protocol(s) for log collection? If there is more 
than one protocol, how will the entity inserting the log-me indicator 
decide which one? (There isn't any opportunity here to negotiate which 
one will be used.)

- This has security implications. How would the server sending the log 
decide if it can trust the specified server? Would it have a list of 
servers it trusts? This seems like a hard problem. And it may need to be 
solved for each protocol that might be used to transfer logs. It is 
glossed over in the security considerations.

	Thanks,
	Paul

On 6/21/13 6:29 AM, Dawes, Peter, Vodafone Group wrote:
> Hello Mary,
> I would like the dispatch working group to consider two drafts at IETF-87 as follows:
>
> 1) http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-dawes-dispatch-logme-reqs-02.txt
> This draft was discussed at IETF-86 and has been updated with potential solutions to requirements (clause 7). I would like to propose that INSIPID adopt this work.
> (from IETF-86 http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/dispatch/trac/wiki#)
> •Logging: General support for adopting this work. Proposal to update INSIPID WG with a new deliverable.
> 	◦Charter: http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dispatch/current/msg04560.html
> 	◦Related documents:
> 		■draft-dawes-dispatch-logme-reqs
>
> 2) http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-dawes-dispatch-mediasec-parameter-06.txt
> An informational RFC describing a header field parameter to distinguish security mechanisms that protect media (as opposed to those that protect signalling) between a UA and its first-hop SIP entity, and to create an IANA registry to list names of such media-specific security mechanisms.
>
> Regards,
> Peter
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: dispatch-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:dispatch-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Mary Barnes
> Sent: 18 June 2013 23:05
> To: DISPATCH
> Cc: Cullen Jennings
> Subject: [dispatch] DISPATCH @ IETF-87 Deadlines
>
> As a reminder, the deadline for letting the chairs know that you are planning to submit something for consideration for the IETF-87
> deadline is June 24th, 2013 (next Monday - 6 days time).   The
> subsequent deadlines are also in the wiki:
> http://tools.ietf.org/wg/dispatch/trac/wiki
> Noting, that the draft deadlines are the same as the IETF draft deadlines.
>
> Regards,
> Mary
> DISPATCH WG co-chair
> _______________________________________________
> dispatch mailing list
> dispatch@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dispatch
> _______________________________________________
> dispatch mailing list
> dispatch@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dispatch
>