Re: [dispatch] Murray Kucherawy's No Objection on draft-ietf-dispatch-javascript-mjs-13: (with COMMENT)

"Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com> Tue, 11 January 2022 17:02 UTC

Return-Path: <superuser@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dispatch@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dispatch@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0CEE53A040C; Tue, 11 Jan 2022 09:02:51 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id S0HUhsUPq_fH; Tue, 11 Jan 2022 09:02:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ua1-x92c.google.com (mail-ua1-x92c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::92c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 948583A03FA; Tue, 11 Jan 2022 09:02:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ua1-x92c.google.com with SMTP id m90so15766452uam.2; Tue, 11 Jan 2022 09:02:49 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=ss1X1RRpDm/5C8sBMD0ct/b+mJmzOWCw01z8Zug+ztA=; b=iMnLRtPr77lPV2jceLZCgsh4HVdf+6+RCddfowa9UciWsibgJih+3BWjzSeVriXcAn HhC0+/f0tU9XPVldQMYRy/fvGn+91Q3ZsBGh9HjHC7PIz5qjW6N5/jgirew3PkpCr9i1 B/lWpBh/igc7HSChpCIjTFzhhEX1i1mkbhCOlq9J9U6XUyGVEaE0FQpDJ/wmQha6x5zj V6rCY+rt9kn6WKcQgvELRJrhTRR1B5q6ehGn0QEBDvRwX9yhkw4mYDuEVxHvbrGDG51N t7yRpZRy8iZu68fiGI79RTxL7N/l2uCSv+y2XA2deZn/hEjNj60Pt4xBqMeF4duICPrP QJ0w==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=ss1X1RRpDm/5C8sBMD0ct/b+mJmzOWCw01z8Zug+ztA=; b=o3SwZSeKaoZpU3WF6NpoSZcbcGPiP1NrLrK2kH1JFvm+9BreyLwFXzxFHzGfiFpoxt MtFMkd+dQVrHy1Q5p48qsTsfRL56/tVfaR5ijPV5D598vGysQ+75vTv7pnv6rGAkOeew JdOgLM8zAgkVVObib8ZloAi8H21eNkX04+YTZeoB40y7o5/f6aMxiSpObB/xvXKdnxhR TjqdaXDd7/q92XIsM1GQLdGcnjHd060q4iqdz8tWV+4cv8dlMx3TmjAbxbPNQEssHnO6 /waOsb7cWYvjpuyG2IC7VTy2F+dD198sATQIRySPTHVDfTwfQpbglJffPCnzGqPl+3dz uyHQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533w1PKvGcQKxVSiSXH9ykefn22Xd+f9nj099rkz2BcOVZLC7IuB PLTn1nxHw8WKu8msGkaAGi/MjeOoFTgBwijyvEw=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwHlm6deTxaLw3KQMOouTtmjqr9nb3jiG33EIzOqpI+VHThKgAVSgYo4K92ddWG6bBr6v7WS3dUm5Ri++u38Bo=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6102:512:: with SMTP id l18mr2447172vsa.57.1641920567896; Tue, 11 Jan 2022 09:02:47 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <164144481153.28700.9521326921012553920@ietfa.amsl.com> <CADizRgYZhzFrNsoFP0M845zK9DgGi5Ci6pgVGVfcNzPkT31JyQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAL0qLwYgc13KXriZNPcB-XqC7i_ORDw01C5h2x93U22R3VCnSg@mail.gmail.com> <CADizRgaN9BvLztmJ6Q+kjV8fJM_hhXkQxFSRX2mgaFsP1RaBCA@mail.gmail.com> <CAL0qLwZnh+EVeg6QbfphzEhLei2BfETfs_tMKKBkk9v_w_AvaA@mail.gmail.com> <CADizRgbda=0HhSNyniHK-350upgkrc3jJUpW6MiQ+4SnME+VAA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CADizRgbda=0HhSNyniHK-350upgkrc3jJUpW6MiQ+4SnME+VAA@mail.gmail.com>
From: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2022 09:02:36 -0800
Message-ID: <CAL0qLwYQk3KEOd+0PYCLuadBmrpi1KYbdDRuJ3hhne3D19Y39Q@mail.gmail.com>
To: Mathias Bynens <mths@google.com>
Cc: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-dispatch-javascript-mjs@ietf.org, dispatch chairs <dispatch-chairs@ietf.org>, DISPATCH WG <dispatch@ietf.org>, Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000032ece105d5516c4a"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dispatch/UGnmgK3H5bIoef3DvCTZ93YaHuQ>
Subject: Re: [dispatch] Murray Kucherawy's No Objection on draft-ietf-dispatch-javascript-mjs-13: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: dispatch@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: DISPATCH Working Group Mail List <dispatch.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dispatch>, <mailto:dispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dispatch/>
List-Post: <mailto:dispatch@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dispatch>, <mailto:dispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2022 17:02:51 -0000

On Mon, Jan 10, 2022 at 11:13 PM Mathias Bynens <mths@google.com> wrote:

>
>
>> Any further comment on the MUST issue I raised?
>>
>
> This refers to the following paragraph:
>
> ```
> This document may be updated to take other content into account. Updates
> of this document may introduce new optional parameters; implementations
> MUST consider the impact of such an update.
> ```
>
> This MUST is not new; this text is inherited from RFC4329 (section 3). For
> our draft, we’ve been hesitant to make changes other than the ones that
> were needed to match implementation reality & ensure compat.
>

"The sins of the father" and all that.  :-)

I do appreciate the desire for minimal change from an already-approved
document.  I also think that propagating text that was improper to begin
with should be given due consideration.

As she's the responsible AD here, at this point I'll defer to Francesca on
the MUST question.

-MSK