[dispatch] Next steps on SIP-CLF

"Vijay K. Gurbani" <vkg@alcatel-lucent.com> Fri, 01 May 2009 19:58 UTC

Return-Path: <vkg@alcatel-lucent.com>
X-Original-To: dispatch@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dispatch@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D0963A6D5E for <dispatch@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 1 May 2009 12:58:47 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.527
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.527 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.072, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nQwZFlcmTf2e for <dispatch@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 1 May 2009 12:58:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ihemail3.lucent.com (ihemail3.lucent.com [135.245.0.37]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 495E13A6C51 for <dispatch@ietf.org>; Fri, 1 May 2009 12:58:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from umail.lucent.com (h135-3-40-61.lucent.com [135.3.40.61]) by ihemail3.lucent.com (8.13.8/IER-o) with ESMTP id n41K03kX029329 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 1 May 2009 15:00:03 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from [135.185.236.17] (il0015vkg1.ih.lucent.com [135.185.236.17]) by umail.lucent.com (8.13.8/TPES) with ESMTP id n41K01wA021228; Fri, 1 May 2009 15:00:02 -0500 (CDT)
Message-ID: <49FB54C1.30206@alcatel-lucent.com>
Date: Fri, 01 May 2009 15:00:01 -0500
From: "Vijay K. Gurbani" <vkg@alcatel-lucent.com>
Organization: Bell Labs Security Technology Research Group
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (Windows/20070728)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "dispatch@ietf.org" <dispatch@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/x-pkcs7-signature"; micalg="sha1"; boundary="------------ms020305000106060501080703"
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.57 on 135.245.2.37
Subject: [dispatch] Next steps on SIP-CLF
X-BeenThere: dispatch@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: DISPATCH Working Group Mail List <dispatch.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dispatch>, <mailto:dispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dispatch>
List-Post: <mailto:dispatch@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dispatch>, <mailto:dispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 May 2009 19:58:47 -0000

Given that there is enough interest in the topic of SIP-CLF
and enough passionate people to support both sides of the
argument on binary vs. ASCII, we might as well start thinking
of a place to get the work done.

Following dispatch's role, maybe we should think how to form
a place to get this work done, i.e., forming a BoF or EG or
directing the work to an existing WG.  To that extent, if
anyone wants to help put a concrete proposal together for
SIP CLF work, I will be more than happy to work with them to
define problem statement and proposal for new work.  We could
do that part in dispatch, I believe.

Regarding dealing with the technical aspects of the work, we
could start a new IETF mailing list so that the technical
discussions happen on that list and the process discussions
can continue on dispatch.

ADs: please advise if this is appropriate.

Thanks,

- vijay
-- 
Vijay K. Gurbani, Bell Laboratories, Alcatel-Lucent
1960 Lucent Lane, Rm. 9C-533, Naperville, Illinois 60566 (USA)
Email: vkg@{alcatel-lucent.com,bell-labs.com,acm.org}
Web:   http://ect.bell-labs.com/who/vkg/