Re: [dispatch] Next steps on SIP-CLF

[Cullen Jennings <[e-mail]>]

On May 1, 2009, at 2:00 PM, Vijay K. Gurbani wrote:

> Given that there is enough interest in the topic of SIP-CLF
> and enough passionate people to support both sides of the
> argument on binary vs. ASCII, we might as well start thinking
> of a place to get the work done.
>
> Following dispatch's role, maybe we should think how to form
> a place to get this work done, i.e., forming a BoF or EG or
> directing the work to an existing WG.  To that extent, if
> anyone wants to help put a concrete proposal together for
> SIP CLF work, I will be more than happy to work with them to
> define problem statement and proposal for new work.  We could
> do that part in dispatch, I believe.

Sound great - I'd be happy to see this happening.


>
>
> Regarding dealing with the technical aspects of the work, we
> could start a new IETF mailing list so that the technical
> discussions happen on that list and the process discussions
> can continue on dispatch.

Sounds like a reasonable plan. I'm not sure we want to do this for all  
things but I think it sounds like a good experiment to try for this  
one. I'll work with you to get the list set up.

Cullen <in my AD role>