Re: [dispatch] draft-mohali-dispatch-originating-cdiv-parameter: question/comment
Brett Tate <brett@broadsoft.com> Tue, 29 March 2016 14:07 UTC
Return-Path: <brett@broadsoft.com>
X-Original-To: dispatch@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dispatch@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5E7712D820 for <dispatch@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 29 Mar 2016 07:07:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.601
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.601 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=broadsoft-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id F6_aZxfKpvUL for <dispatch@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 29 Mar 2016 07:07:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ig0-x233.google.com (mail-ig0-x233.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c05::233]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8C8F212D833 for <dispatch@ietf.org>; Tue, 29 Mar 2016 07:07:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ig0-x233.google.com with SMTP id ma7so34498037igc.0 for <dispatch@ietf.org>; Tue, 29 Mar 2016 07:07:51 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=broadsoft-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=from:references:in-reply-to:mime-version:thread-index:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=MiT5B5JGAm+wJyG0OmnUKX3+zMR5+FLENDOSxJZwRPs=; b=rJCKBd2cb6RS2apsYRmWnpIEsAEtdzHf4x6M2t6PrrIOn03EiOHLqqE7kglKFyDml2 6HAE3VZJC0uw8AIpnevNzLHPl9qKbSuUDRN6QMiufXRriXw655KsqTNenwzRYIsnG9Hi +9XNYpHAPbiiXDBEruPTBh80zg8tGvuCNvHe+GiDT0o0EeCFMmyeADMV9Z40MyopL64l ZnK1ayHKv+pA2SUGA3iaYbF1cbXYOu1ujpUwmnLlqcNnc/TYiFQPPktoWqVoFkYFsGjI gVsGFtOcw0W1lNbVvS0HRSw7Zv8/00pXMTcU+SHPphm1bd5gTTIjF2kh0JiuRchUR8Ld I0eQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:references:in-reply-to:mime-version :thread-index:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=MiT5B5JGAm+wJyG0OmnUKX3+zMR5+FLENDOSxJZwRPs=; b=hAKdW7/OtrJ6KxLCdHBPrC7DIP6bqNvHcokG25h6cGfWu5n9KvUZxV14m/BCcBTuJW NMFW5bCqi75+FeInhIpkQDXr0N0zwO1DvgHakn0vnIkEVjFSy/O6VVnNW5/oWSxzfuaP 0ZuSMTETTF99otIyXRvmhPjV9fuyb91YbGQ4T+fSWQ1CG+wX4kIczq3F56TeZyPFUNYn 9LCP/4SPVT4sQ3BxnvGbQA0hdjPizfFFeskZ6Ikmlj0kdSzAFi0ASEK653D0D7t7d8rz Dm2DJdLYWJQHOlBK3muW0Wh0uPOvLAxGLOCdVXiMkI3lK7R9Uvhlpea4tamliofZEq+W WBag==
X-Gm-Message-State: AD7BkJKWHKCLbjnZvNkHoLswDoDeZQfR4XvoB9MaPPqHGzgbSEFmCKSrilH4B0SSGDPtCONk3UQCbN0BjH6+WRlD
X-Received: by 10.50.111.8 with SMTP id ie8mr16397670igb.46.1459260470895; Tue, 29 Mar 2016 07:07:50 -0700 (PDT)
From: Brett Tate <brett@broadsoft.com>
References: d50f75327ab8843f911520a74372f33a@mail.gmail.com
In-Reply-To: d50f75327ab8843f911520a74372f33a@mail.gmail.com
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0
Thread-Index: AdGFLKUn7pBcj0z4RBmzP+jh+8We2gElrkVA
Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2016 10:07:50 -0400
Message-ID: <12f8e2ad9f7e9f28abac7aba96bea50d@mail.gmail.com>
To: marianne.mohali@orange.com, dispatch@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dispatch/daAs5oRh68BSbVpz4dNlqalcQOM>
Subject: Re: [dispatch] draft-mohali-dispatch-originating-cdiv-parameter: question/comment
X-BeenThere: dispatch@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: DISPATCH Working Group Mail List <dispatch.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dispatch>, <mailto:dispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dispatch/>
List-Post: <mailto:dispatch@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dispatch>, <mailto:dispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2016 14:07:58 -0000
Hi, You can ignore my question/comment since it is likely better to address through errata. I created errata ID 4648. http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=5502&eid=4648 Thanks, Brett > -----Original Message----- > From: Brett Tate [mailto:brett@broadsoft.com] > Sent: Wednesday, March 23, 2016 1:53 PM > To: 'marianne.mohali@orange.com'; 'dispatch@ietf.org' > Subject: draft-mohali-dispatch-originating-cdiv-parameter: question/comment > > Hi, > > Since draft-mohali-dispatch-originating-cdiv-parameter is updating RFC 5502, > should the draft be updated to include the missing rule concerning when name- > addr must be used? > > As mentioned within the following email from 2013, RFC 5502 does not indicate > to use the RFC 3261 section 20 bracket rule (or provide a similar rule). > Without such a rule, it is ambiguous if parameters decode as part of > PServedUser-value or served-user-param. > > http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sipcore/current/msg05731.html > > Thanks, > Brett