Re: [dispatch] Proposal for a new WG: Privacy Enhanced RTP Conferencing (PERC)

[Paul Kyzivat <[e-mail]>]

On 4/16/15 2:29 PM, Adam Roach wrote:
> On 4/16/15 13:23, Paul Kyzivat wrote:
>> The advertisements are send over a data channel.
>
> Is this like a "data channel" in the same sense that WebRTC uses that
> term?

Yes. Chosen in order to facilitate the possibility of WebRTC clients for 
CLUE.

> If so, I think there are some good ways to handle this in line
> with PERC's goals (there are reasonable ways to ensure that the data
> channels terminate at the trusted key management node rather than the
> mixer).

I fear we are talking past one another.

Conceivably it would be possible to separate the signaling logic of clue 
from the media mixing logic, so that there could be a *trusted* entity 
that manages the keys and also does the mixing of clue advertisements, 
but that offloads the actual media "mixing" (switching in this case) to 
an untrusted media box.

But it will require some careful thought, and probably changes to clue.

I guess that would be a CLUEv2, and we shouldn't get too hung up on it 
right now.

	Thanks,
	Paul