IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dispatch] Proposed charter for DCRUP v0.2

Federico Santandrea <federico.santandrea@diennea.com> Tue, 04 April 2017 09:51 UTC

Return-Path: <federico.santandrea@diennea.com>
X-Original-To: dispatch@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dispatch@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A50E71295E7 for <dispatch@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 4 Apr 2017 02:51:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.902
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.902 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id x6x_jAzgnoEp for <dispatch@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 4 Apr 2017 02:51:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail3.informatica.it (mail3.informatica.it [151.99.189.163]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C781C129517 for <dispatch@ietf.org>; Tue, 4 Apr 2017 02:51:38 -0700 (PDT)
To: dispatch@ietf.org
References: <alpine.OSX.2.20.1703271129060.7578@dhcp-80f1.meeting.ietf.org> <CAL0qLwZ9pDcOsooOgrpN9feDywc-+=twNtN4BpvOQ6ny68yLfA@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.OSX.2.20.1703301431530.8232@dhcp-80f1.meeting.ietf.org>
From: Federico Santandrea <federico.santandrea@diennea.com>
Message-ID: <b93b65c8-1589-2b62-79a1-645805bff840@diennea.com>
Date: Tue, 04 Apr 2017 11:51:33 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.8.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <alpine.OSX.2.20.1703301431530.8232@dhcp-80f1.meeting.ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-GatewayId: federico.santandrea=2.522837320016076132561703@diennea.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dispatch/pA4EM22qxdgCJUYwpcWurom6olI>
Subject: Re: [dispatch] Proposed charter for DCRUP v0.2
X-BeenThere: dispatch@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: DISPATCH Working Group Mail List <dispatch.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dispatch>, <mailto:dispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dispatch/>
List-Post: <mailto:dispatch@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dispatch>, <mailto:dispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Apr 2017 09:51:43 -0000

I'd suggest:

"bugs in DNS provisioning software" ->
   "limits in some DNS provisioning software".

On 30/03/2017 21:37, John R Levine wrote:
> 1024 bit signatures are common, longer signatures are not because bugs in
> DNS provisioning software prevent publishing longer keys as DNS TXT
> records.

-- 
Federico

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email