Re: [dispatch] IETF108 DISPATCH Minutes

Timothy Mcsweeney <tim@dropnumber.com> Wed, 11 November 2020 17:10 UTC

Return-Path: <tim@dropnumber.com>
X-Original-To: dispatch@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dispatch@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 854673A190A for <dispatch@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 11 Nov 2020 09:10:18 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.896
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.896 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kuTDvLA2Uvpf for <dispatch@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 11 Nov 2020 09:10:17 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mout.perfora.net (mout.perfora.net [74.208.4.194]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D51323A17DB for <dispatch@ietf.org>; Wed, 11 Nov 2020 09:08:19 -0800 (PST)
Received: from oxuslxaltgw03.schlund.de ([10.72.76.59]) by mrelay.perfora.net (mreueus003 [74.208.5.2]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0Lmae5-1k4eyn4AUt-00aHx2; Wed, 11 Nov 2020 18:08:11 +0100
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2020 12:08:10 -0500
From: Timothy Mcsweeney <tim@dropnumber.com>
To: Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com>, DISPATCH WG <dispatch@ietf.org>
Message-ID: <620476948.13264.1605114490582@email.ionos.com>
In-Reply-To: <1728083860.882593.1596215282277@email.ionos.com>
References: <E72B7AFF-74F4-4CBB-B6F2-197DCD783BC0@nostrum.com> <CALaySJKV6Hv=9bvr5WYTM7G7khL3cSyxM_9tFGAoLgNwdD9CMA@mail.gmail.com> <1728083860.882593.1596215282277@email.ionos.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
Importance: Normal
X-Mailer: Open-Xchange Mailer v7.10.3-Rev26
X-Originating-Client: open-xchange-appsuite
X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:OpSjNsL8j9s/C1EXb7ve/yRUQN9XnI3vEUHjYUghFDw5RxBQiyl uksDBSs/vZ0rl1yJbcT/g2IwteH6zquD8kJ49LKwns9OdHyp5eS0t2S3nnTGH6219DfIfCl QzZ0hua+eSbNXNkGGYJxF2Hsbv8khymCw1kRhcDO59WJXLeUm7UG/TCjPpDGTMLHi4LaMPB /VFCHeHFahW/nhD81wSVQ==
X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:wI7gmgeWhFE=:3g/NKzHWFmz6wL1qk3Vrc5 snEq2Fxo6doyx7Q/v+ZpHn/IA4WsSPVgmS7ewjVBah38RpBU3XZ52EXjbevgKP2x74XcBnLLz KFfQbMkwecYcF6qVXXQlMu5m1yBSImFR20QZOfiADjWLXo2dpoVBc/HO5FwcFuo7PPMVfFPR7 Z1iXOCF7GNY+sFdmtwj2K4jhK0bTCy7EoQYsdnk4QJ+iYtQDqWjFAMtCvD14QjYwA5vZmAumD p3ivDsaRha8PmqF085XHT7fZwAl5OWyhgFEU+YT22LqbE5n9aQjDFde+8zzDfHnq1AXXc00+y 6M3EsX6OPow0New7ZTS24HLnbe7LcX4/VujxFr6lBb1mnnWDEQn1xsrkGuu3SfDGSi7aNK20Q bzE9+4dLGRu3763azLbop9xJMKufCqcmkbo/L8AinKostnBFMPgrkQl7tpoMG40k6PcciUIbs sU3EBHPBPg==
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dispatch/zsGTwRMZGyOQUhpILCT9_sjQ9ps>
Subject: Re: [dispatch] IETF108 DISPATCH Minutes
X-BeenThere: dispatch@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: DISPATCH Working Group Mail List <dispatch.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dispatch>, <mailto:dispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dispatch/>
List-Post: <mailto:dispatch@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dispatch>, <mailto:dispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2020 17:10:23 -0000

> On 07/31/2020 1:08 PM Timothy Mcsweeney <tim@dropnumber.com> wrote:
> 
> 
> The Youtube video of this Disptach teleconference has a transcription that is really good. I would like to add one thing to the minutes from that transcription starting at roughly the 14:11 minute marker.
> 
> * **Cullen Jennings**: so i was actually going to suggest 
> that in the in dispatch working group 
> is administratively was fine but i think 
> AD sponsored is fine as well
> um it gives the AD a little bit more 
> coverage and given there's likely to be 
> appeals around this 
> having a working group consensus around 
> it might be a slight advantage 
> that's that's the only thing i would 
> mention