Re: [Diversity] IETF Sustainability - New Website Launch

S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com> Wed, 15 June 2016 08:44 UTC

Return-Path: <sm@elandsys.com>
X-Original-To: diversity@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: diversity@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8611C12D1C8 for <diversity@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 15 Jun 2016 01:44:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.216
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.216 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.426, T_DKIM_INVALID=0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (1024-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=opendkim.org header.b=1odCLgIh; dkim=fail (1024-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=elandsys.com header.b=pO4NgOJ6
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ru9xjNq0vC8d for <diversity@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 15 Jun 2016 01:44:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx.ipv6.elandsys.com (mx.ipv6.elandsys.com [IPv6:2001:470:f329:1::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05F9012D195 for <diversity@ietf.org>; Wed, 15 Jun 2016 01:44:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from SUBMAN.elandsys.com ([197.226.210.165]) (authenticated bits=0) by mx.elandsys.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id u5F8i7gC023093 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 15 Jun 2016 01:44:17 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=opendkim.org; s=mail2010; t=1465980261; x=1466066661; bh=RYZcMNpTXhLP3EPhHZho9WIe2lRB7h7oS8LTM/AbQWE=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:Cc:In-Reply-To:References; b=1odCLgIhJuQ1OoMyEKtbdvPh5zRAH5yBFaGnEfc6mYz4YAJpDTrhnVK+rOENJ0IFo LWyu9jDUXIP+NSZiNYN3CPWKKLiOKunhvtOqkYgrcp29NWuuLFdKVHxG9NT/W1Om8j fLKffIMD8IYOBBLwDYdxeT9impBI4IYqM2Dupuv8=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=elandsys.com; s=mail; t=1465980261; x=1466066661; i=@elandsys.com; bh=RYZcMNpTXhLP3EPhHZho9WIe2lRB7h7oS8LTM/AbQWE=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:Cc:In-Reply-To:References; b=pO4NgOJ68K9quiOPJwhLYUipL7fexQz5A5lc/6+vsxkQiDF3wBF6sFIN3BO1DJ1S9 6Ph9FMkiH0WExquQMJn5LU66tz+W5G/4dst3hB/D3f/cF/YePqaoXXhhB4zapGa26v 42RLduCxvQk20oZMmu1czTUeQKYL31X5Y9zD5r8Y=
Message-Id: <6.2.5.6.2.20160615002835.0ae5fd98@resistor.net>
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.5.6
Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2016 01:41:57 -0700
To: Kathy Brown <brown@isoc.org>, jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
From: S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com>
In-Reply-To: <d5f31813-f633-6f0a-bbe6-46256597686d@bwijnen.net>
References: <D3859A7D.26D97%brown@isoc.org> <0CD958A6-1EF1-4266-871F-58E410BE981D@ietf.org> <d5f31813-f633-6f0a-bbe6-46256597686d@bwijnen.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/diversity/lQA6wLnyxo7M_GQhkLX1Vsi90do>
Cc: diversity@ietf.org, "Bert Wijnen \(IETF\)" <bertietf@bwijnen.net>
Subject: Re: [Diversity] IETF Sustainability - New Website Launch
X-BeenThere: diversity@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Diversity open mailing list <diversity.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/diversity>, <mailto:diversity-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/diversity/>
List-Post: <mailto:diversity@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:diversity-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/diversity>, <mailto:diversity-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2016 08:44:26 -0000

Hello,

[Cc changed to diversity@ietf.org]

At 00:12 15-06-2016, Bert Wijnen (IETF) wrote:
>A few comments:
>- I find the picture on page 3 in-appropriate. It gives the idea
>   that one supports poor people? I do not think that this is the
>   case. I have found the usage of poor (often children, often of color)
>   people in these sort of cmapaigns very questionable. Certainly given the

The usage of the photo in such a context could be viewed as 
culturally insensitive.  Given that the campaign is intended to 
sustain the IETF, what does it say about the IETF?

Regards,
S. Moonesamy