Re: [Diversity] Loud humming is subject to cultural bias (was: 6tsch BoF)
SM <sm@resistor.net> Thu, 01 August 2013 16:17 UTC
Return-Path: <sm@resistor.net>
X-Original-To: diversity@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: diversity@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6314211E810F for <diversity@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 1 Aug 2013 09:17:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.558
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.558 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.041, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DNsAr5KhgnOp for <diversity@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 1 Aug 2013 09:17:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx.ipv6.elandsys.com (mx.ipv6.elandsys.com [IPv6:2001:470:f329:1::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 919F611E810A for <diversity@ietf.org>; Thu, 1 Aug 2013 09:17:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from SUBMAN.resistor.net (IDENT:sm@localhost [127.0.0.1]) (authenticated bits=0) by mx.elandsys.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r71GHB9s014698; Thu, 1 Aug 2013 09:17:15 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=opendkim.org; s=mail2010; t=1375373838; bh=G2irVHLRL5VCL99/EbvZp0aKo3v70KqCm/XKNri9Y1w=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:Cc:In-Reply-To:References; b=nYsKy+hqkyU5bJxoQQkPEf7RbmEoeESz+TpdyImTZXrhQv1HGcNyoWch9vgbCYK2g 5OjknZfi+VNztx5IQL5jfBW3W0Y/RkDy/ToSnojXre3O3jJRF/fwVegVDS306YxR2z kZcskMZjXgsfBkaDRw9XKWf2nr4ldWQ+B2wO+4Ak=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=resistor.net; s=mail; t=1375373838; i=@resistor.net; bh=G2irVHLRL5VCL99/EbvZp0aKo3v70KqCm/XKNri9Y1w=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:Cc:In-Reply-To:References; b=mlZXSERToA1yh+oFh5v9vq+qrUKgHrUnrhWNc1Nidx8zhlSlsOeInb96jQHmS5cvl cQZk1zOYImk3UbMwR9ONdQ7GQMmKy5QitvpsUBXEnuod5nHJC46ileWf233oMoM11e lonRhbJrTy/pfR80Mw5kUTJxPX5WrEULCSKLR+8M=
Message-Id: <6.2.5.6.2.20130801085913.0d161b80@resistor.net>
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.5.6
Date: Thu, 01 Aug 2013 09:16:38 -0700
To: Andy Bierman <andy@yumaworks.com>
From: SM <sm@resistor.net>
In-Reply-To: <CABCOCHSadV_=Z9crk1paXeZXQm_ROKSQr-irAbSbwKyRZ3W5zg@mail.g mail.com>
References: <81B94276-0050-434D-8451-26068E199CA5@gmail.com> <CABCOCHStZmY8DM-ehNGtM4eMz-qQuKOeAy06y9Hpe5oZ2dTnLg@mail.gmail.com> <B42E4980-1A8C-45C2-8A52-8C9C4955431E@checkpoint.com> <CABCOCHQ14OKAQKrPqsNHBS7abyS8VLTdsQd=USQ4YzN6ot9ipA@mail.gmail.com> <6.2.5.6.2.20130801075701.0d1d3398@resistor.net> <CABCOCHSadV_=Z9crk1paXeZXQm_ROKSQr-irAbSbwKyRZ3W5zg@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Cc: diversity@ietf.org, Yoav Nir <ynir@checkpoint.com>
Subject: Re: [Diversity] Loud humming is subject to cultural bias (was: 6tsch BoF)
X-BeenThere: diversity@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Diversity open mailing list <diversity.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/diversity>, <mailto:diversity-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/diversity>
List-Post: <mailto:diversity@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:diversity-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/diversity>, <mailto:diversity-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Aug 2013 16:17:32 -0000
Hi Andy, At 08:35 01-08-2013, Andy Bierman wrote: >I was not aware that maintaining anonymity was a goal >built into the WG process. It seems that this would >be incompatible with mailing list review comments. I am acknowledged in Section 9 of draft-housley-rfc2050bis-02. Mr Housley is the IAB Chair. Mr Curran is the President and CEO of ARIN. Mr Huston is the Chief Scientist at APNIC. As these distinguished gentlemen have not mentioned that there is a problem with my mailing list comments I assume that there isn't any problem. I note that according to the IESG draft-housley-rfc2050bis-02 reflects IETF Consensus. I assume that the learned members of the IESG have carefully reviewed draft-housley-rfc2050bis-02 and my mailing list comments about that draft. It seems to me that there isn't any incompatibility with mailing list review comments. :-) Regards, -sm
- [Diversity] Loud humming is subject to cultural b… SM
- Re: [Diversity] Loud humming is subject to cultur… SM
- Re: [Diversity] Loud humming is subject to cultur… Adrian Farrel
- Re: [Diversity] Loud humming is subject to cultur… Andy Bierman
- Re: [Diversity] Loud humming is subject to cultur… Andy Bierman