Re: [Diversity] Loud humming is subject to cultural bias (was: 6tsch BoF)

[Andy Bierman <[e-mail]>]

Hi,

I meant that it is difficult to remain anonymous when the
email to the WG has your email address in it.

Perhaps you can point me to the RFC 2026 text (or other RFC)
that says something about protecting the disclosure of the identity
of the person expressing agreement or disagreement with
some question asked in a WG meeting.

Andy


On Thu, Aug 1, 2013 at 9:16 AM, SM <[e-mail]> wrote:
> Hi Andy,
> At 08:35 01-08-2013, Andy Bierman wrote:
>>
>> I was not aware that maintaining anonymity was a goal
>> built into the WG process.  It seems that this would
>> be incompatible with mailing list review comments.
>
>
> I am acknowledged in Section 9 of draft-housley-rfc2050bis-02.  Mr Housley
> is the IAB Chair.  Mr Curran is the President and CEO of ARIN.  Mr Huston is
> the Chief Scientist at APNIC.  As these distinguished gentlemen have not
> mentioned that there is a problem with my mailing list comments I assume
> that there isn't any problem.  I note that according to the IESG
> draft-housley-rfc2050bis-02 reflects IETF Consensus.  I assume that the
> learned members of the IESG have carefully reviewed
> draft-housley-rfc2050bis-02 and my mailing list comments about that draft.
>
> It seems to me that there isn't any incompatibility with mailing list review
> comments. :-)
>
> Regards,
> -sm