IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dix] DRAFT: WAE BOF minutes

Eric Rescorla <ekr@networkresonance.com> Tue, 18 July 2006 20:35 UTC

Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1G2wHa-0004Aq-Og; Tue, 18 Jul 2006 16:35:06 -0400
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1G2wHZ-0004Al-1x for dix@ietf.org; Tue, 18 Jul 2006 16:35:05 -0400
Received: from raman.networkresonance.com ([198.144.196.3]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1G2wHX-0003YA-Pc for dix@ietf.org; Tue, 18 Jul 2006 16:35:05 -0400
Received: by raman.networkresonance.com (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 055611E8C34; Tue, 18 Jul 2006 13:35:03 -0700 (PDT)
To: Digital Identity Exchange <dix@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [dix] DRAFT: WAE BOF minutes
References: <198A730C2044DE4A96749D13E167AD37BD6557@MOU1WNEXMB04.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com> <20060718194907.GW21538@binky.Central.Sun.COM>
From: Eric Rescorla <ekr@networkresonance.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2006 13:35:02 -0700
In-Reply-To: <20060718194907.GW21538@binky.Central.Sun.COM> (Nicolas Williams's message of "Tue, 18 Jul 2006 14:49:08 -0500")
Message-ID: <86mzb67itl.fsf@raman.networkresonance.com>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.1007 (Gnus v5.10.7) XEmacs/21.4.19 (berkeley-unix)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 68c8cc8a64a9d0402e43b8eee9fc4199
X-BeenThere: dix@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
Reply-To: EKR <ekr@networkresonance.com>, Digital Identity Exchange <dix@ietf.org>
List-Id: Digital Identity Exchange <dix.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dix>, <mailto:dix-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/dix>
List-Post: <mailto:dix@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dix-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dix>, <mailto:dix-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: dix-bounces@ietf.org

Nicolas Williams <Nicolas.Williams@sun.com> writes:
> Come to think of it, TLS too could use the same approach to make session
> resumption stateless.  That would be nice, very nice, if we can get it.

Something like this?

4507 Transport Layer Security (TLS) Session Resumption without
     Server-Side State. J. Salowey, H. Zhou, P. Eronen, H. Tschofenig. May
     2006. 


-Ekr

_______________________________________________
dix mailing list
dix@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dix

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email