Re: [dmarc-ietf] From: rewriting, was Email standard revision

Dave Crocker <dcrocker@gmail.com> Mon, 02 December 2019 16:29 UTC

Return-Path: <dcrocker@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 459CB120077 for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 2 Dec 2019 08:29:43 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.997
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.997 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6OsqDeIgF4r3 for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 2 Dec 2019 08:29:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ot1-x333.google.com (mail-ot1-x333.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::333]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BDB10120018 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Mon, 2 Dec 2019 08:29:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ot1-x333.google.com with SMTP id k14so15963802otn.4 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Mon, 02 Dec 2019 08:29:41 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language; bh=pKsYmGVyiTTfmOfWvPjUwUTLBHT26IeAEDHL2DA+Kdc=; b=u+Y3QEdKrGfX81KP0qO2FUT2jojg3QKyzvrCKMGgXsODACILsudiDhAYEYVjO2aX3l fWwVr8m9bFfr1cpcyOm5TeMxnBLDi9KAWG8c4mxErmFzrMYMVkhaW8kz6zQ0AlmsaE8S ghJeYZ1n/NkWIQ40hImOldkQ/jV2uqtJsk4rl3V57FaFJ6FcGAzGZRYulxn9gLpRyz7y GamSaB9iqu0XLaeB/cwC+7UcjvJm5XdPtT9HKGFSzIqvTUNkb28b6p9Y9r25jba3dT9f ibAY7RvJktZMkAn13z1nu8RObNPnKZ/ztujRtKQD0vmojyMZApcWBimYeGfEWjwrmS0Q bl9w==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language; bh=pKsYmGVyiTTfmOfWvPjUwUTLBHT26IeAEDHL2DA+Kdc=; b=lRxGAZeOah6ikZTu2817iCyyU3+smk8Nm0cdntudIvZrcFa9LpArieyiU5KXjW24pi xBaDMRu2rgrTvRvYB53AtFht/p41JAN6Wb+KhBAWeVXMY0ltFgQ1/+jpNHMEGNmaBKVp KJx2twdPVwc0rn5aDi7BOYwlvVLQWhAR2LBVCie/+YUJ+X46e79mFcOmHCIbspPlqLH1 LkD5LYk3QVhCFZ5pNdilI/81m653GOMNamZWW0FL4bvd6MvGlwPWjur6KuN9I9XUmepq lphQN06qk6jMcHj7Hy36veYHusdnRrBmLESPJikgoYyT2LV7aUyKTzL5VkILdbiNFktN htkA==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWv7ce/k2Eoj4cOAT/Oba1rtPrrRCOk+GOU4FFMtolon+sHZYyF lIqVqpI524Bu4scmoZZvMSw=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqx453d6/xPBofwQMS/JGS0Lm3nIdUwMPuT5GyHAtzSxQ8vC1uXm5PDW92FNx81mcS6tjW13Tw==
X-Received: by 2002:a9d:66ca:: with SMTP id t10mr10762271otm.352.1575304180841; Mon, 02 Dec 2019 08:29:40 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ?IPv6:2600:1700:a3a0:4c80:918d:344a:cfb0:d1b? ([2600:1700:a3a0:4c80:918d:344a:cfb0:d1b]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 47sm320579otf.54.2019.12.02.08.29.38 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 02 Dec 2019 08:29:40 -0800 (PST)
To: "Kurt Andersen (b)" <kboth@drkurt.com>
Cc: Alessandro Vesely <vesely@tana.it>, dmarc-ietf <dmarc@ietf.org>, John C Klensin <john@jck.com>
References: <458060E1B9558124988A46B7@PSB> <f741b82b-3314-47e1-b0cf-ab491ffa14a6@www.fastmail.com> <2E5DE6BD20354824E99E564F@PSB> <84F1134E-5031-46BB-8C78-9E76FF971100@episteme.net> <A39990063436871E76405B96@JcK-HP5.jck.com> <79130263-06d5-6a63-e6c6-81b67695eb48@tana.it> <b18f3646-8733-f921-4e38-33543aef489f@gmail.com> <CABuGu1r6DVaK4uFgw_BTwpFAd3kN1G4fjPRw7JLCTAve=aRb5g@mail.gmail.com>
From: Dave Crocker <dcrocker@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <9dc4e992-db54-a9b9-edca-629e3285a1a7@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 2 Dec 2019 08:29:35 -0800
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.9.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CABuGu1r6DVaK4uFgw_BTwpFAd3kN1G4fjPRw7JLCTAve=aRb5g@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------EEC363E82FB7674D63E4EA84"
Content-Language: en-US
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/-KDgf1dxxxqcfP6iMAmOcpK8PkE>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] From: rewriting, was Email standard revision
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Dec 2019 16:29:43 -0000

On 12/2/2019 7:56 AM, Kurt Andersen (b) wrote:
> There's also already RFC7960 which expands upon 5598 with specific 
> reference to DMARC's impact.

ahh. thanks.

It will help to have folk comment on the IETF mailing list, so that 
Klensin's comments don't just get responses from me.

d/

-- 
Dave Crocker
Brandenburg InternetWorking
bbiw.net