IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dmarc-ietf] indeterminisim of ARC-Seal b= value

Seth Blank <seth@valimail.com> Fri, 31 March 2017 16:14 UTC

Return-Path: <seth@valimail.com>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07EDE12968B for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 31 Mar 2017 09:14:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.699
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=valimail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GlEI5Qsy_dsX for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 31 Mar 2017 09:14:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qk0-x22a.google.com (mail-qk0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c09::22a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3B11A1296DC for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Fri, 31 Mar 2017 09:13:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qk0-x22a.google.com with SMTP id d10so71063874qke.1 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Fri, 31 Mar 2017 09:13:47 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=valimail.com; s=google2048; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=HFqNX17cwc8IEOMM38s5j2rcc41ANuC8ukHsSLBItmc=; b=eBz247FwU4xz157a9BcuVACVHRmrb2dqcZ74kvJ7JnfxKSTwxGGlew/Bj7AUFszzq8 6AjeWqf7y9n1pFfcvWH+Ck3njpNaA+byXg2kMJzIsa+VN3OYZQyf/wXzgsjUeEXUY5yI N6I5DUuJYB8U+IhTDKI6vmS7kfgoiYxsFFReN7JbqzOR5azDpDWaj2vqWNtp/FPWIJNb v4XN+SvwqnEZIBFOl2vMaLZTY4h7OkXXtZEP+3osBinJgCWmXbGVfc9/4qWJh7KsXU69 9fFl6PY07Q668PnXwIDfzKfqJI4x9BB0WRlxjcFeR20zHPFOtnWB6ULupcbGHKXfv/26 eXlg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=HFqNX17cwc8IEOMM38s5j2rcc41ANuC8ukHsSLBItmc=; b=fCuMikn+mnjMAr/5JCGJJXYunivDlLJOK0EXSaoRpMUjpXZ8NN9DYbDlPmEVcs9xDu 4kTjY3mXfKHBYjA8vAZtLtB5izzVmOhE4jSUZttnDHtemhDF4YGCgIfc0bXdCRxvO+MU oyEx+fbJeeNsLp6CpwHLNx7b8AvLaDHyyotrUoCYytrv5aZpXnT/bk5eM/rDFtqVtuvc 8JZnY2LrPcs6AedshhVdgqfw41S0M4T0FqJHLNX5ig06RypOSNAqidsqcDI8ORv1era7 9txOQoQDD1LM9Cx8eFSqkF4C8mvx1fKZ5yhVeUq1qwxjjItMnGVm2qkpbG0A/PpbPcVL uUjg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AFeK/H1pnWIU/fDcx4dUyHMp8vOS3U28iwviYHNYxC9OK2NxUamaELTStEwkmLnY3bVqccIAColJmKsAhl5htg==
X-Received: by 10.55.72.7 with SMTP id v7mr3690166qka.47.1490976826298; Fri, 31 Mar 2017 09:13:46 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.200.42.166 with HTTP; Fri, 31 Mar 2017 09:13:25 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <37056495-806d-b2c1-c5be-05dfbb7dda21@dcrocker.net>
References: <CANtLugO_D1Mz_v_341pc5O1mZ7RhOTrFA3+Ob5-onp72+5uRfA@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.OSX.2.20.1703272118210.2533@ary.local> <CAOj=BA0YKHYrkseR=wwgZn0_GNBKfdL7jmHehgBRzxqGKV6C1g@mail.gmail.com> <2978391.eJVbVTHBlo@kitterma-e6430> <CAL0qLwbP4c+09=TNSOsDqKwcp6iw++aGW8jDhARoVwvsghSLvA@mail.gmail.com> <01QCKR5S5OXK0003XB@mauve.mrochek.com> <CAOj=BA3p-XQT=AeR4PHC-udWsn7rOmtR+UQHV0vbVofDKYOH_Q@mail.gmail.com> <01QCKXW9MZ4Q0003XB@mauve.mrochek.com> <1cf7325b-6f77-7cda-e330-025b7ddb0b92@dcrocker.net> <CAOZAAfM_fKf+egqmYQorobPB07kQpi5rP4rcb4Kj3fsLvcoRVw@mail.gmail.com> <2f516997-7c5e-2fad-1aeb-51590383f9c7@bbiw.net> <CAOZAAfMasvt8+_sFW=vvq-S-UHNVQ_H=1+sbkOojasm5GgNLRw@mail.gmail.com> <37056495-806d-b2c1-c5be-05dfbb7dda21@dcrocker.net>
From: Seth Blank <seth@valimail.com>
Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2017 09:13:25 -0700
Message-ID: <CAOZAAfPZ+PGMaq2uAXXpKS3Eb5MUKchXa-OLi0oVh_yfaVcW6Q@mail.gmail.com>
To: Dave Crocker <dcrocker@bbiw.net>
Cc: Scott Kitterman <sklist@kitterman.com>, "dmarc@ietf.org" <dmarc@ietf.org>, "Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com>, ned+dmarc@mrochek.com, Peter Goldstein <peter@valimail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a114a8e6819fde5054c0918f8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/1k9r09qNeYiIE756NEz9Ub_h3DU>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] indeterminisim of ARC-Seal b= value
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2017 16:14:22 -0000

Thank you, Dave.

What's the best way to proceed from here for the working group?

On Fri, Mar 31, 2017 at 8:55 AM, Dave Crocker <dhc@dcrocker.net> wrote:

> On 3/30/2017 10:41 PM, Seth Blank wrote:
>
>> If the consensus here is that the matter is not worth pursuing further,
>> that is fine - I just want to make sure we're all talking about the same
>> thing.
>>
>
>
>
> Except that 'the matter is not worth pursuing' isn't what I heard anyone
> saying and it definitely wasn't what I meant...
>
> I'm not sure whether it's been presented here sufficiently, but I believe
> your underlying concern is based on observed problems with implementation
> of the current ARC specification.  That is, from interoperability testing,
> the actual use of ARC is proving far too fragile.
>
> If that's true, then there needs to be an effort to a) understand the
> fragility better, and b) consider ways to make ARC more robust.
>
> So while there has been strong push-back against the /solution/ that you
> proferred, I am not clear whether there is working group understanding of
> the motivating concern or with the way to resolve it.
>
>
>
> d/
>
> --
> Dave Crocker
> Brandenburg InternetWorking
> bbiw.net
>
> _______________________________________________
> dmarc mailing list
> dmarc@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
>



-- 

[image: logo for sig file.png]

Bringing Trust to Email

Seth Blank | Head of Product for Open Source and Protocols
seth@valimail.com
+1-415-894-2724 <415-894-2724>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email