IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dmarc-ietf] indeterminisim of ARC-Seal b= value

"John Levine" <johnl@taugh.com> Fri, 31 March 2017 02:54 UTC

Return-Path: <johnl@taugh.com>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C81C120046 for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 30 Mar 2017 19:54:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id c9q6x5O023m5 for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 30 Mar 2017 19:54:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from miucha.iecc.com (abusenet-1-pt.tunnel.tserv4.nyc4.ipv6.he.net [IPv6:2001:470:1f06:1126::2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3A11C126CE8 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Thu, 30 Mar 2017 19:54:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 49145 invoked from network); 31 Mar 2017 02:54:39 -0000
Received: from unknown (64.57.183.18) by mail1.iecc.com with QMQP; 31 Mar 2017 02:54:39 -0000
Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2017 02:54:17 -0000
Message-ID: <20170331025417.6484.qmail@ary.lan>
From: John Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
To: dmarc@ietf.org
Cc: dcrocker@bbiw.net
In-Reply-To: <1cf7325b-6f77-7cda-e330-025b7ddb0b92@dcrocker.net>
Organization:
X-Headerized: yes
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/ql0Gg-q2JwwpDdY76sRD-a2I-nI>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] indeterminisim of ARC-Seal b= value
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2017 02:54:43 -0000

>My reading of this too-long message thread is that there is essentially 
>no support for making ARC's header-related issues any different from 
>DKIM's, so I encourage the chair to shut this thread down.

What he said.  Can we please limit subsequent discussion of testing
about how to test ARC as defined and implemented, not some not-ARC
that is not defined and certainly will not be implemented?

R's,
John

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email