Re: [dmarc-ietf] Looking for degrees of freedom with Intermediaries - Effort and Policy

"Kurt Andersen (b)" <kboth@drkurt.com> Sat, 16 May 2015 18:11 UTC

Return-Path: <kurta@drkurt.com>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FE4E1A0019 for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 16 May 2015 11:11:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 3.522
X-Spam-Level: ***
X-Spam-Status: No, score=3.522 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_95=3, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YdGG7J_bnPIA for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 16 May 2015 11:11:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ie0-x230.google.com (mail-ie0-x230.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c03::230]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8E50A1A0007 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Sat, 16 May 2015 11:11:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by iesa3 with SMTP id a3so57106777ies.2 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Sat, 16 May 2015 11:11:40 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=drkurt.com; s=20130612; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; bh=LGqHzDXMaJH2Dn+wWgfL9nMKFHNbbkBMx532s4H0sSI=; b=BoXfos5JYOe4HeXMBTSwnDFZJfAV6L0Zj+dfkHH37mG4Ep6Yh3q08Cl6GiJx4/ACUB R76WVsDV5VEqqKcd7zIDu02ya09tlOsjvAnuFVF2PYYPI7EXKmbLllkgp2sNj0AjmfqE 4K1sf+QurxdFWAJWiHWWDxTrmJtYiNCtEoa84=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=LGqHzDXMaJH2Dn+wWgfL9nMKFHNbbkBMx532s4H0sSI=; b=Ym8rDSkClpyznLuVh0xpExFedh90dN301MV83z5emldX1dmvN5a5Q25iKdtg0J3sS/ TpsSdZqNGJ79FlLKx6I6C5nUNdwVqMjZ+y5E+dCwMY1qY9CpRxZ67PFStH7L68E897ya 4iOmELFmvyxWgighEscA3iIes6fivJZL5U0GB9Dcws2PuJQfsxJiTyuBgrJGz95Kvsuh cNAchoqBdkuiJ5PrcG93cyJSqqcKvIjOuR+4Dm2ZVXM8iPXxq33uAXgUpviOuM1W+mWe bQoq+Gih4K0ILtLlxJT4Z757GJjzjgzAqumI+2BRwg08Waf5D8/ejMi+yXCURYK7zBLp WFzQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmvVAC71OcIjKLXJYDx0bCfEp9ElUNY487EH0JO5jGkxy6vBqRPSTiC2BnZ5fNdJ+C93Veu
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.107.8.144 with SMTP id h16mr20933379ioi.38.1431799899828; Sat, 16 May 2015 11:11:39 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: kurta@drkurt.com
Received: by 10.36.3.148 with HTTP; Sat, 16 May 2015 11:11:39 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <8A9DBFEF-2202-412C-B067-1B594DC4E05F@isdg.net>
References: <555656FC.5010609@dcrocker.net> <55567634.1060305@isdg.net> <BL2SR01MB605ED64F7F556EECEED73C996C60@BL2SR01MB605.namsdf01.sdf.exchangelabs.com> <8A9DBFEF-2202-412C-B067-1B594DC4E05F@isdg.net>
Date: Sat, 16 May 2015 08:11:39 -1000
X-Google-Sender-Auth: OoPr8WQPPgUcWyHcpgs_KprRxmQ
Message-ID: <CABuGu1oNgEbHy5_du8wfNqie7eQxZQR9RoOLbRmu7ViVohRpzA@mail.gmail.com>
From: "Kurt Andersen (b)" <kboth@drkurt.com>
To: "dmarc@ietf.org" <dmarc@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a113f91566b4ab0051636e40f"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/4ntxBykYLOLEjgKzFFBISVC9IKM>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] Looking for degrees of freedom with Intermediaries - Effort and Policy
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 16 May 2015 18:11:42 -0000

On May 15, 2015 2:59 PM, "Hector Santos" <hsantos@isdg.net> wrote:

>
> > On May 15, 2015, at 8:09 PM, Terry Zink <tzink@exchange.microsoft.com>
> wrote:
> >
>

With all due respect to the amazing abilities of this list to bikeshed,
could we try to return this particular thread to the question(s) raised by
Dave? To wit:

It might be helpful to consider /basic types/ of changes that are
> reasonable/unreasonable for intermediaries, distinct from how they might
> fit into an entire solution.
>

--Kurt Andersen