IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dmarc-ietf] dmarc - New Meeting Session Request for IETF 110

Dave Crocker <dcrocker@gmail.com> Fri, 11 December 2020 17:51 UTC

Return-Path: <dcrocker@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33F883A0D39; Fri, 11 Dec 2020 09:51:55 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.099
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id uxmUMgqfNGpQ; Fri, 11 Dec 2020 09:51:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pf1-x42d.google.com (mail-pf1-x42d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::42d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1CE1E3A0A42; Fri, 11 Dec 2020 09:51:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pf1-x42d.google.com with SMTP id b26so7444493pfi.3; Fri, 11 Dec 2020 09:51:54 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:content-language; bh=gs7Sqq5LWRV7mF76fH3QBidphQCFIjlfI6P4i7XA/Tw=; b=c+aM+Esev7gtHnwsUA4JgQW1jUkSh+TzTzOvHC4+/tC7A3vhzKYRZcoBbsaZlQ97mL Brsdl5F+Erw0t2umhpHuqy/MHpM/O0v64TvqiN8zjtN714hLL0iAQofQvu46FPZHxPPp JIouTlpv9H53iuwbmAezxHO6dUezqA994cJWFx5cQCzE65NYSRkqqB5sokVMWuAXzsOd cjQkPJZWVEjvDkppnfQjkqNfuKTLmosM4ijByMasqGDTaRhBkboRb/U7xo5uz19ckfOo DV2oBwvMvVIGbq0qAqGGBCZiYgtivexJmlIRgdCZH9b0jJg6Ofq39VuR9CSRsB5LP31G V+vw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding :content-language; bh=gs7Sqq5LWRV7mF76fH3QBidphQCFIjlfI6P4i7XA/Tw=; b=cXEQnvOi/h0uFpKPDUIhLLTJfJ79NaG7/mYCxWrk3V3KfRqxmN2MZSsC6PXFG68sLM rJgSEjbgx3+trGac6XjDK82NG11kF3rh6K2zQUZl9kUdNvOe2RIU9KdBTHZuloV0jEO1 VDnlhzXpUZYAz4+z9jPVomuCucbxnKuKGfX2I8yrB8cY1vlPpI71NSGTugvJr2ASZGsb b3uYNDaI/KqzyQtGV7KnyMIp2arkv6v3iSr0zXTv1woxJlnnTWPs+wtiQWdFefetewbw zsFN1nQjyRvAJ00xty3Wuk5k0iERmNHisliHPzuGh6HuXEpfm2RIesUD6NGZBrl0saJ6 p7EA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533JmKYTMyrV2x7AYUIY51ureLe9+AJwvrM243xvZRRHc4CoeSPt HzoeSxMsPvyaZV84hcHz9IUcqDu2Tco=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyTiVGvxaEXtWrD2YBHEhLhMa5YF9Y3OTQ8BfzU83B99VO8VK3lrMio76U/J87ivuGIETWUkQ==
X-Received: by 2002:a63:150b:: with SMTP id v11mr13040293pgl.257.1607709113445; Fri, 11 Dec 2020 09:51:53 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.0.109] (c-24-130-62-181.hsd1.ca.comcast.net. [24.130.62.181]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id h32sm11705630pgl.36.2020.12.11.09.51.52 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 11 Dec 2020 09:51:52 -0800 (PST)
To: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com>, Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com>
Cc: "dmarc@ietf.org" <dmarc@ietf.org>, Kurt Andersen <kboth@drkurt.com>, dmarc-chairs@ietf.org
References: <160745190172.15620.17081247178872475062@ietfa.amsl.com> <CABuGu1okiT+3kD-WDfEvVf=ccKFL3eB0eH8XWO0NfmCe5SVfMQ@mail.gmail.com> <65714d6f-1074-4cb6-a939-6b8ef07e907a@www.fastmail.com> <CAL0qLwaRNrX6pY3OyGvzAF7-BWodTH09z3ALSEO-tRB5hbDiog@mail.gmail.com>
From: Dave Crocker <dcrocker@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <37b1b126-3f12-2cc5-b8d8-a3980920a8cf@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2020 09:51:50 -0800
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.5.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAL0qLwaRNrX6pY3OyGvzAF7-BWodTH09z3ALSEO-tRB5hbDiog@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Language: en-US
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/6SGhx-u2D8kwQopa9ZKvH6bOOmg>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] dmarc - New Meeting Session Request for IETF 110
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2020 17:51:55 -0000

On 12/11/2020 9:49 AM, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote:
> I suggest that this working group has enough of a work queue before it 
> that having both an interim meeting and a scheduled session at IETF 
> 110 is certainly worth considering.

+1

Interims should be saved for times the wg has hit a wall in making 
progress and needs the greater communication efficiencies of real-time 
interaction.

d/

-- 
Dave Crocker
dcrocker@gmail.com
408.329.0791

Volunteer, Silicon Valley Chapter
American Red Cross
dave.crocker2@redcross.org

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email