Re: [dmarc-ietf] dmarc - New Meeting Session Request for IETF 110
Michael Thomas <mike@mtcc.com> Fri, 11 December 2020 17:55 UTC
Return-Path: <mike@fresheez.com>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A4CC3A0D66 for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 11 Dec 2020 09:55:53 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.75
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.75 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=mtcc.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LtZoGmwRB9QD for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 11 Dec 2020 09:55:52 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pg1-x533.google.com (mail-pg1-x533.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::533]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 143753A0D47 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Fri, 11 Dec 2020 09:55:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pg1-x533.google.com with SMTP id 143so1522645pge.10 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Fri, 11 Dec 2020 09:55:51 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mtcc.com; s=fluffulence; h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :in-reply-to:content-language; bh=OjPUKw5nDThAmMqCQC504axLptzUz5RuBCeNbwpUsyg=; b=VM8G7jnWdb4BaVy50oWN4VhcNQsiS3f2Plcx5mS+jT4k9TqSIg6Uk0nD279PiDuJJA CAV74lh6iNIltdI+b2O3zGue+IcrmrXdfum+cVVybO7TJvNPGa+wVKkl9lV1ykomp2X8 yzbBznYt3t+Aw5vb9GOUvKeQXu0T/qF5/cXTilytFGWvrCrVMSySTT1FFP8OWzp+SI8H kS9txEzHsbkWeCFg4i/mq73H5ndpGbL7SGTbMi2wRzShGtpsiUFvSB0rMY1GNNj37Po6 BxAsWJwcsvuuvaCDwnwLMxPdKss2vTqyLMQKRnDBVU9zUxDkeckH4HrQz5GABnp10U2s uynA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language; bh=OjPUKw5nDThAmMqCQC504axLptzUz5RuBCeNbwpUsyg=; b=FAD+s5J2NB7LCUztJIzgE95YrCahGuOoEa/he9PSbZIQewf7rLnteWDRc72UD1Mz92 FkhEsQFyyxTj7WJh+XJoYhDW2UZb9fRUSsr9bY2dxIiTyITZlifHeKMRMpg6w5PBRa/i hOeK51tRnToiHiMZEzip2ezFTc0D6UXuYRnbZ8b5ilO5BF6XmFhVAsapFX4RW9SFhwtF x97vi/qVKoMf0z3VhmN+gnWhpKs7JrIVTbbttwYN+EaGsE2oOOfHI1HY/HCHLiCpwh1r Xlqx4QNBXy6YHqb6H2oR2DYIeRmzGls/eucp0OZt7kNb2JQZN6lHsY7QQ8ZGs8kQR+/m tsBg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531KxsjZ4h4TBwLJLJfwlkkAoLiZJC9ZoH+PD4Sh5PUY3L6sSghU FaUbTNxuauzrJuxpG4/KjgA6i6jlm7LhXA==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyXa3dmvW8+Lt85JHpyZZRpQeVanrL73fjh2rOd66/1PA08n/gIyXHu2WAhop056diVfykXSA==
X-Received: by 2002:a63:f84d:: with SMTP id v13mr12915033pgj.234.1607709351070; Fri, 11 Dec 2020 09:55:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mike-mac.lan (107-182-41-154.volcanocom.com. [107.182.41.154]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id g5sm11159855pfr.87.2020.12.11.09.55.50 for <dmarc@ietf.org> (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 11 Dec 2020 09:55:50 -0800 (PST)
To: dmarc@ietf.org
References: <160745190172.15620.17081247178872475062@ietfa.amsl.com> <CABuGu1okiT+3kD-WDfEvVf=ccKFL3eB0eH8XWO0NfmCe5SVfMQ@mail.gmail.com> <65714d6f-1074-4cb6-a939-6b8ef07e907a@www.fastmail.com> <CAL0qLwaRNrX6pY3OyGvzAF7-BWodTH09z3ALSEO-tRB5hbDiog@mail.gmail.com>
From: Michael Thomas <mike@mtcc.com>
Message-ID: <8ff51cd7-6138-d534-c535-86fba9c6b56d@mtcc.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2020 09:55:48 -0800
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.5.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAL0qLwaRNrX6pY3OyGvzAF7-BWodTH09z3ALSEO-tRB5hbDiog@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------1EF501321AFAB599E2D8A316"
Content-Language: en-US
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/7Na5iOB0IOrApoNdsXGwV5B5Xgk>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] dmarc - New Meeting Session Request for IETF 110
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2020 17:55:54 -0000
On 12/11/20 9:49 AM, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote: > > > I concur. The fee for virtual meetings is less than half that of the > usual in-person meetings since the IETF's costs are obviously lower, > but we do need to keep the lights on. For people that can't afford to > participate otherwise, there is a fee waiver program available. > I know this is the wrong list, but what about people who could afford it, but don't want to afford it? It's not like I'm making money from participating and that it's just a cost of doing business. These discussions ran into the trillions of messages on the ietf list so i was never able to figure that part out. Mike
- [dmarc-ietf] dmarc - New Meeting Session Request … IETF Meeting Session Request Tool
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] dmarc - New Meeting Session Requ… Kurt Andersen (b)
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] dmarc - New Meeting Session Requ… Alexey Melnikov
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] dmarc - New Meeting Session Requ… Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] dmarc - New Meeting Session Requ… Dave Crocker
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] dmarc - New Meeting Session Requ… Michael Thomas
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] dmarc - New Meeting Session Requ… Murray S. Kucherawy