[dmarc-ietf] draft dkim-transforms
Michael Thomas <mike@mtcc.com> Sun, 06 December 2020 20:21 UTC
Return-Path: <mike@fresheez.com>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BAEF83A0B4E for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 6 Dec 2020 12:21:45 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.651
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.651 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=mtcc-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Nbimh9DQzHtv for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 6 Dec 2020 12:21:44 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pf1-x42f.google.com (mail-pf1-x42f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::42f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8800E3A0B49 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Sun, 6 Dec 2020 12:21:44 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pf1-x42f.google.com with SMTP id 131so7654544pfb.9 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Sun, 06 Dec 2020 12:21:44 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mtcc-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=to:from:subject:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding:content-language; bh=WZoOeWLAXuAXB34V43uNc6H144nOSVAe2WrAM99X924=; b=SN/oh+jstN5mlHXKsZdDFWVYXmwCmH/V632NtzP9/xmBTpWrb03e7YhJ14hWDunQaB Q4N49BPgGsGD1NzpVn7QpU5BYXWmXttqZFQZqgfu53Ag0WB2awn7k4lK/HWx3041iNN3 aDBOuSQTidgPqC4AcURgvs2cStiPijxTaPtN1pfkzMbW5Lqs1F9rYbLZN6XE4TpN5Fki KyquwMiGkf8FbG8/hcmblJaQtnfDPsn+1dZIzdLOhjK6GDyedHRG/7fMCPFlnpe7N/gp H0lgzc2qJ/bwov8+9ceEOPhqbKZzJvRodM69ofI13p6BDYdpWobjJ/9xwpj1x2f505QV 3ujQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:to:from:subject:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-language; bh=WZoOeWLAXuAXB34V43uNc6H144nOSVAe2WrAM99X924=; b=jwNcVj/YRv0XAl3fdZqiYo5iPWjRKkmxRbDAv1WxVraffS5U04+cj2eiZy1+jjSk36 eQHM7gsOgPd2O7s3RgaNxJH+UwCJ/B2HQa7V6MIVQqbTyMl8UFp4sZHCuq0QICskjzo4 rEi8LDhtRsKW4OAajNTPH/m9R89jeSq6kVLtjIeycO9nUtQSkzNdsUOsFd+XDzpQ1RDq 32qzNuG7k9QgpNeWtQE+og1EoPAb111FNl5EiJZDN3jMtApDB40hYW7JHSdsLMcVFLQl vtHxXSXBpvszJ3TG8RkxowzRXPXJ/hZJ3uTxMnEFtqQ7+22Yj0Z0oP+wECE2i+zb8jMk /KBw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531C0VnXosuNgDq4qIZf+GU1VtmOoqkpu9E1TztWfPGpRmN+45z5 zVqyS2ClZ/YhOkSfQXYdqMuURiwegHvUjA==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzNNBjXX4bIIKIB76VxHJvyZLCrQ6j7dpt9qzcMpePlb0VWPgNV671L18fexBFPTgUOsrxCow==
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6a00:80b:b029:198:124a:d58a with SMTP id m11-20020a056a00080bb0290198124ad58amr12750814pfk.56.1607286102350; Sun, 06 Dec 2020 12:21:42 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mike-mac.lan (107-182-42-33.volcanocom.com. [107.182.42.33]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id u1sm8155650pjn.40.2020.12.06.12.21.41 for <dmarc@ietf.org> (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Sun, 06 Dec 2020 12:21:41 -0800 (PST)
To: "dmarc@ietf.org" <dmarc@ietf.org>
From: Michael Thomas <mike@mtcc.com>
Message-ID: <24757248-20d6-5d7f-b226-2420a1e75f91@mtcc.com>
Date: Sun, 06 Dec 2020 12:21:40 -0800
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.5.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Language: en-US
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/9EKYJLq1WTJ4c7eALv7sgtBvJd4>
Subject: [dmarc-ietf] draft dkim-transforms
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 06 Dec 2020 20:21:46 -0000
I scanned through Murray's draft and wonder if it's been implemented? Or whether we could in some way simulate what percentage of traffic it would work for? It mostly mirrors a lot of the things I did way back when, but it does go farther with some of the MIME stuff. The advantage I had with my heuristics and z= stuff is that it doesn't require cooperation with the mailing list software, so I could actually run numbers to see how well it was working. As I said earlier, I think the basic question is what constitutes success. Mike
- [dmarc-ietf] draft dkim-transforms Michael Thomas
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] draft dkim-transforms Murray S. Kucherawy