Re: [dmarc-ietf] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dmarc-failure-reporting-04.txt

Alessandro Vesely <vesely@tana.it> Fri, 19 August 2022 09:46 UTC

Return-Path: <vesely@tana.it>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2CDC2C14CF16 for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 19 Aug 2022 02:46:11 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.107
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.107 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=neutral reason="invalid (unsupported algorithm ed25519-sha256)" header.d=tana.it header.b=8P6OUJr7; dkim=pass (1152-bit key) header.d=tana.it header.b=ArAYoRVY
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UEkrRo418JnH for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 19 Aug 2022 02:46:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from wmail.tana.it (wmail.tana.it [62.94.243.226]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EFB16C14F74F for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Fri, 19 Aug 2022 02:45:58 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=tana.it; s=epsilon; t=1660902356; bh=bTrmODIRxSQSMN0oWBQ8gAqTnBFHTFVqrWM3gfpYWf0=; h=Date:Subject:To:References:From:In-Reply-To; b=8P6OUJr7b8ET4AlhF+rwfT4J4rdlTzPjyIzafHwn+Gp2Z5sApmX4G7DcQGMvmcWI8 Hbzbfbs7u+cq0fGnEcGCw==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=tana.it; s=delta; t=1660902356; bh=bTrmODIRxSQSMN0oWBQ8gAqTnBFHTFVqrWM3gfpYWf0=; h=Date:To:References:From:In-Reply-To; b=ArAYoRVYpdGkL46JwrM+nIvf5tsDUCkUDaIqBBL5WJElwPmsP7eduhmEgOYKBjDsU EtdYSEIqg8WLoKCYwOWzpk3z5ZmaKUV1NGc0bquaI1g+1DXgwnIDhma0Fw6cZP21Vv rZESydCfyuxi8i0/QK7QUIo4URietqAPBmGRBke97WuDKlfWLKOM8fIVb2yW7
Author: Alessandro Vesely <vesely@tana.it>
Received: from [172.25.197.111] (pcale.tana [172.25.197.111]) (AUTH: CRAM-MD5 uXDGrn@SYT0/k, TLS: TLS1.3, 128bits, ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) by wmail.tana.it with ESMTPSA id 00000000005DC0DF.0000000062FF5BD4.0000444E; Fri, 19 Aug 2022 11:45:56 +0200
Message-ID: <cbd1f8c9-6204-bf92-9910-bc366533f9b8@tana.it>
Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2022 11:45:56 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.12.0
Content-Language: en-US
To: "John R. Levine" <johnl@iecc.com>, dmarc@ietf.org
References: <20220817151234.7C48547E2C1D@ary.local> <2865425.PqQoGlAqvt@zini-1880> <b944c8d6-76ac-7c3d-8395-c5aaae4a834c@tana.it> <ac19b4be-e822-b6b9-2f4f-aaf1f38e8046@iecc.com>
Authentication-Results: tana.it; auth=pass (details omitted)
From: Alessandro Vesely <vesely@tana.it>
In-Reply-To: <ac19b4be-e822-b6b9-2f4f-aaf1f38e8046@iecc.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/BVG27uIJf3qUb7mGdis6HmlJq2Y>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dmarc-failure-reporting-04.txt
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2022 09:46:11 -0000

On Fri 19/Aug/2022 00:05:08 +0200 John R. Levine wrote:
>> Done on Github copy.
> 
> I was surprised to see that the markdown version of the draft has disappeared 
> from the github repo.


I eliminated it because it wasn't the source code.  I added an html version to 
view the current content.


> Todd and I have found it much easier to edit the markdown version of dmarcbis 
> than hand twiddle the XML codes, and I have twiddled more than my share of XML.


I've only occasionally used markdown so it's more difficult that XML for me.

In addition, XML features depend on whether one uses mmark, pandoc, Kramdown or 
whatever, an probably varies by version as well.  Xml2rfc V3 seems to be quite 
stable, and anyway it's the only file which gets posted to datatracker.


Best
Ale
--