IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dmarc-ietf] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dmarc-failure-reporting-04.txt

Alessandro Vesely <vesely@tana.it> Thu, 18 August 2022 17:46 UTC

Return-Path: <vesely@tana.it>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C35BCC14F74A for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 18 Aug 2022 10:46:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.106
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.106 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=neutral reason="invalid (unsupported algorithm ed25519-sha256)" header.d=tana.it header.b=797MSM5L; dkim=pass (1152-bit key) header.d=tana.it header.b=CjdpaUUz
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id n76zFNpayHQO for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 18 Aug 2022 10:46:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from wmail.tana.it (wmail.tana.it [62.94.243.226]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ADDE0C1522D0 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Thu, 18 Aug 2022 10:45:34 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=tana.it; s=epsilon; t=1660844729; bh=jCGy+b86Tu8HC45vXka81XER43Azhb5X5GNdEdQTyMs=; h=Date:Subject:To:References:From:In-Reply-To; b=797MSM5LS9hBLCBlFJQ6BaluaLdE0CRduXs/p83f0Q4VDlniEYEQDH4UCDh84FTub Fx+2v5h6M1cAQzU52ZrAQ==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=tana.it; s=delta; t=1660844729; bh=jCGy+b86Tu8HC45vXka81XER43Azhb5X5GNdEdQTyMs=; h=Date:To:References:From:In-Reply-To; b=CjdpaUUz9OMTPJtzLrfPSzvmbaq0unZv6Y6KaUEFAGp9eARV01XfoWAa8uBBtWyi/ g1Jv6YZSJuzJoLWKGt/s9+LuMZySwptI9VWCn+seICa6IZ7krY/2ogJlkBBqdhfu2a UNAVe95ZCcLjDEI6bHVWQXPgplQfsIZ2jXQBIN0SKTes1FkCwk/vpcrbTVFRD
Author: Alessandro Vesely <vesely@tana.it>
Received: from [172.25.197.111] (pcale.tana [172.25.197.111]) (AUTH: CRAM-MD5 uXDGrn@SYT0/k, TLS: TLS1.3, 128bits, ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) by wmail.tana.it with ESMTPSA id 00000000005DC0C3.0000000062FE7AB9.00005900; Thu, 18 Aug 2022 19:45:29 +0200
Message-ID: <8ebc1e73-a48d-c548-3fec-383511c83e7e@tana.it>
Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2022 19:45:29 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.11.0
Content-Language: en-US
To: dmarc@ietf.org
References: <CAL0qLwZ_QAeyvFMJyBCY-2z26ZiZWhQ2bMgH8p5RVre_ejj4ng@mail.gmail.com> <3776543.lEtTLlY0iv@zini-1880> <CAHej_8kY7COrLJ0cfdUW-8yNAnDdqQ8N7V0aYMAgh+yz8wAj0g@mail.gmail.com> <2047283.5WsagkHXQI@zini-1880>
Authentication-Results: tana.it; auth=pass (details omitted)
From: Alessandro Vesely <vesely@tana.it>
In-Reply-To: <2047283.5WsagkHXQI@zini-1880>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/dFKIxhxo8-E6sgXEJxabpdXlsmM>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dmarc-failure-reporting-04.txt
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2022 17:46:56 -0000

On Thu 18/Aug/2022 17:53:35 +0200 Scott Kitterman wrote:
> Generally I think the less said about failure reporting in DMARCbis the
> better.


+1, if we stick to having all tags defined in one document, we make it 
difficult for future documents to add new tags.  There is a registry.


Best
Ale
--

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email