IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dmarc-ietf] Fwd: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7489 (7865)

John R Levine <johnl@taugh.com> Mon, 25 March 2024 17:54 UTC

Return-Path: <johnl@taugh.com>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F873C180B53 for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 25 Mar 2024 10:54:23 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.107
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.107 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=iecc.com header.b="HyjPdkI5"; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=taugh.com header.b="LB0Y8NJV"
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2XR7Hu8PnLHy for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 25 Mar 2024 10:54:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gal.iecc.com (gal.iecc.com [IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126:0:43:6f73:7461]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 02E82C180B52 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Mon, 25 Mar 2024 10:54:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 11388 invoked from network); 25 Mar 2024 17:54:15 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed; d=iecc.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type; s=2c7a6601ba47.k2403; bh=7JwtpTqbDzjIc5U05LH2QyxrNZhdvUUHnoqHA3dX96I=; b=HyjPdkI5V68Odix3xeASrnwuQE3L+F1rPuvRAWueBBZ0dIPJtfmIzc6Juie6TCOSkNy+MHfKDfdTtMYmeLTkSecYRwjGrBNfFqkrTgJTlKV9X1xvnSRcCi2HA6U5Z1LV5y89C6sNzGypqUmmFcZ3z772t6xNZ8TMur4wzxGnPHS1giXliRNF6Uv+D6ngWyRf0a3AV+yuafWxHDZmUNQiLskk+oUsuVylz9h+fmvz8GqkQzZsBU05s38ejVMqjEXquBroH4GMO0BScjHvgEfe81etlevj3vE/Fv4u0/NOpzJ4uDeGSZy3LJTWe79Nw+R5lH8bdEz2LF2JvtoFSGNDug==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed; d=taugh.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type; s=2c7a6601ba47.k2403; bh=7JwtpTqbDzjIc5U05LH2QyxrNZhdvUUHnoqHA3dX96I=; b=LB0Y8NJV3FfOSs71AZUHt2XvsnptOdmUZBHZU8zJdpvg59MLOHIRv2qqEjwSPt42jQo2kk0iWcttT5JTOP82GNv/sSpZYtuoiuUszG/CLMFdtfschePgVAbZnNBq/4NePkCCCaJFfivNpWR56ZYlahbSPWf/8uh7+ivhLuu/2Fv8IlTUr51hVxSnz2Z/5ph9IC+2FUnBllxg5I+AH0By2MaQ8wIj5mVLgNj2R142yXY4tr5sQZ1Svy2Aex5k2cTV0Aqj6PGifdCpqTXc9T78mjTzu0HuEAEP7GOcw5fNmbBCfBqwp9DbQUROag8kui7MbJvA/ZrKzZMaEarYE7Ky0w==
Received: from ary.local ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) by imap.iecc.com ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) with ESMTPS (TLS1.3 ECDHE-RSA CHACHA20-POLY1305 AEAD) via TCP6; 25 Mar 2024 17:54:15 -0000
Received: by ary.local (Postfix, from userid 501) id E5ADB8619EE0; Mon, 25 Mar 2024 13:54:14 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ary.local (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC4F88619EC2; Mon, 25 Mar 2024 13:54:14 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2024 13:54:14 -0400
Message-ID: <ada8e730-087f-3aa4-3ee3-95e93e6a3255@taugh.com>
From: John R Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
To: Alessandro Vesely <vesely@tana.it>, dmarc@ietf.org
X-X-Sender: johnl@ary.local
In-Reply-To: <3bfe0df7-d5c8-43e9-9e84-ba74cd1bb470@tana.it>
References: <20240323185339.DA2DD85FCC3A@ary.qy> <97bdc6e7-0170-4101-8b57-2e8e7d8d72c6@tana.it> <3bfe0df7-d5c8-43e9-9e84-ba74cd1bb470@tana.it>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/CWG1H78lUx4xZpztUqyFa2FsYCc>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] Fwd: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7489 (7865)
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2024 17:54:23 -0000

On Mon, 25 Mar 2024, Alessandro Vesely wrote:
>> How about:
>> "(::ffff:)?(([01]?\d?\d|2[0-4]\d|25[0-5])\.){3}([01]?\d?\d|2[0-4]\d|25[0-5])"/>
>
>
> Testing yielded a correct fix:
>
>  "(::[Ff]{4}:)?(([01]?\d?\d|2[0-4]\d|25[0-5])\.){3}([01]?\d?\d|2[0-4]\d|25[0-5])"/>

There are lots of other ways to write it, e.g.

  ::00:ffff:12.34.56.78
  0:0:0:0:0:0:ffff:012.034.056.078

and they're actually IPv6 addresses.  Just take it out, if nobody has 
tried to use this form in the past decade, they won't use it now.

> Please take my pull request.

Please take out the grammar change.

Regards,
John Levine, johnl@taugh.com, Taughannock Networks, Trumansburg NY
Please consider the environment before reading this e-mail. https://jl.ly

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email