IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dmarc-ietf] Fwd: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7489 (7865)

John R Levine <johnl@taugh.com> Mon, 25 March 2024 19:59 UTC

Return-Path: <johnl@taugh.com>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC8ACC151986 for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 25 Mar 2024 12:59:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.107
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.107 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=iecc.com header.b="eU0JJLrB"; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=taugh.com header.b="rkrlwFAz"
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id v9gSUhly54TR for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 25 Mar 2024 12:59:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gal.iecc.com (gal.iecc.com [IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126:0:43:6f73:7461]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 69D4FC14CE51 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Mon, 25 Mar 2024 12:59:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 29066 invoked from network); 25 Mar 2024 19:59:33 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed; d=iecc.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type; s=71886601d7a5.k2403; bh=Z5lERMwPGq19iJauI6Sz5GUVMPkxY5+LhIfEzbiJyuE=; b=eU0JJLrBBAqyO1J5WMk5roy6OqpPK1UWeySOoowX8VzlipGpDP1YHMAcu2VclqVWcMb0HaswRbRiD5N92K5uy3EFNsDKkQXQVb241wBoz7x7o47oqfJ91RPLdZ6wyx/vOiKw0YkE+wqV3eDHgVl0RFnIhoHZfKJb4nMFSoSdbYb8N51HdQ6Xzmu7Fa39uoDt/hFHuZjQhf5/c1B4NTSt/2wWqCNHcQQCns/V9f3at/H9/XKWPYqeCCNPtZQJUkd+1Jf4nudxDGxyq4fpwjJNRq6Xj/LPtmbdwKjm7uXMJPAm+N7aAta3XpVwH3xCfzyHBy6utxq7QPMg0gSZ/0tDcA==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed; d=taugh.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type; s=71886601d7a5.k2403; bh=Z5lERMwPGq19iJauI6Sz5GUVMPkxY5+LhIfEzbiJyuE=; b=rkrlwFAzc8AzbX3dzKsah7vIEuh4jlV72idDkNe8mtMDF7odN28Kl7F0CvrIWJHR5y8gZN9w/oQ9hVspMxOaXQgQJrhv8vdZV/ZsTPeqqeOgdB7IxD7OjKfrxWizQPOVxjiCNZ/9cn5VLBsJ69VYZWOKL79KrTR6cKUr10akrFh1IdiTcieK4NahRWlHhN/w0xFZ0MABaXboS0pVA/m4leWYE6xLR2pmJtD/fexzeLxG6STfWogfkMCOFs/CP0inEJ1f2pEQrrZRFjdkJNNZUgH+Aa28ihAIe+A6AuP7cxAXK5wOSGv5wNoZzCBpyidoT2febFdL/rQtV3IXfqdUhw==
Received: from ary.local ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) by imap.iecc.com ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) with ESMTPS (TLS1.3 ECDHE-RSA CHACHA20-POLY1305 AEAD) via TCP6; 25 Mar 2024 19:59:33 -0000
Received: by ary.local (Postfix, from userid 501) id 95E14861B476; Mon, 25 Mar 2024 15:59:32 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ary.local (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62D21861B458; Mon, 25 Mar 2024 15:59:32 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2024 15:59:32 -0400
Message-ID: <c197d5b9-10cb-bba9-d539-22787882cd6f@taugh.com>
From: John R Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
To: "Brotman, Alex" <Alex_Brotman@comcast.com>, Alessandro Vesely <vesely@tana.it>, "dmarc@ietf.org" <dmarc@ietf.org>
X-X-Sender: johnl@ary.local
In-Reply-To: <MN2PR11MB43516AB12EC17D21CDF1E75DF7362@MN2PR11MB4351.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
References: <20240323185339.DA2DD85FCC3A@ary.qy> <97bdc6e7-0170-4101-8b57-2e8e7d8d72c6@tana.it> <3bfe0df7-d5c8-43e9-9e84-ba74cd1bb470@tana.it> <ada8e730-087f-3aa4-3ee3-95e93e6a3255@taugh.com> <MN2PR11MB43516AB12EC17D21CDF1E75DF7362@MN2PR11MB4351.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/d_x0OykheM13huSLcC5qGjuvxcI>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] Fwd: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7489 (7865)
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2024 19:59:41 -0000

> Apologies, which format should be used.  I'm not sure if I should revert to the one from 7489, or some other prior version.

The one that's in the draft now is fine.  Don't add the line with f{4} 
which is an insufficiently general special case.

Regards,
John Levine, johnl@taugh.com, Taughannock Networks, Trumansburg NY
Please consider the environment before reading this e-mail. https://jl.ly

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email