Re: [dmarc-ietf] Draft DMARC BOF Agenda

This is fine with me.

Russ

On Jul 12, 2013, at 5:09 PM, J. Trent Adams wrote:

> 
> I'd offer a friendly amendment to the agenda for consideration:
> 
> On 7/10/13 2:53 PM, Russ Housley wrote:
>> We have discussed the BOF agenda, and this structure still seems to be the right one.
>> 
>>      DMARC BOF Agenda
>> 
>>      Summary of DMARC
>>        -- Goal: Common foundation of DMARC
>>        -- Note: DMARC specification is being AD sponsored
>> 
>>      Summary of Open Issues
>>        -- Goal: What is left for a working group to do?
> 
> It seems that there are likely to be a couple different interpretations
> of the "Open Issues" topic. So far, it seems that most of the questions
> needing answers revolve around interpretations of policy on either side.
> Since we already have a start at identifying some issues, I believe it'd
> be worth the time to discuss them.
> 
> As a reminder, here's a link to the draft that's been offered as input
> to the proposed work group:
> 
> http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-crocker-dmarc-bcp-02.txt
> 
> In that light, I propose breaking the topic into "Possible Technical
> Issues" and "Deployment & Usage Issues".
> 
> HTH,
> Trent
> 
>> 
>>      Charter review
>>        -- Goal: Discuss the draft charter
>> 
>>      Hums
>>        -- Facilitator: Barry Leiba
>>        -- Goal: Is there adequate support for a DMARC WG?
>> 
>> At this time, I am also calling for volunteers to take minutes and to jabber scribe.
>> 
>> Rus
>> _______________________________________________
>> dmarc mailing list
>> dmarc@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
> 
> -- 
> J. Trent Adams
> 
> Profile: http://www.mediaslate.org/jtrentadams/
> LinkedIN: http://www.linkedin.com/in/jtrentadams
> Twitter: http://twitter.com/jtrentadams
> 
> _______________________________________________
> dmarc mailing list
> dmarc@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc