IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dmarc-ietf] Draft DMARC BOF Agenda

"J. Trent Adams" <jtrentadams@gmail.com> Fri, 12 July 2013 21:09 UTC

Return-Path: <jtrentadams@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3495421F9F34 for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 12 Jul 2013 14:09:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id yJdh+npKMkHS for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 12 Jul 2013 14:09:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ie0-x22a.google.com (mail-ie0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c03::22a]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7718D21F9ECA for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Fri, 12 Jul 2013 14:09:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ie0-f170.google.com with SMTP id e11so21885123iej.15 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Fri, 12 Jul 2013 14:09:29 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:x-enigmail-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=oJe+tnMyWUt3AGlIiedU+GLsp5YhD12zFH0J5KIH5FM=; b=Ec6nLb4VW5mBf5+hktBxJAyYErj1NdBACeMPTF8gDVGF1bCL5HxfpLUEol3Iy536uA XmliygAtW9p7IgtcGe8AG6zipoc4tx2anKNn9MFegeA66xGbeEAzXUIthlSP+G3CnBG0 YdGLfMWsm2/7tZvQuc4VtuhRv0q+fG/LxUyFdE7aus9jnQTw5O/l/puBsr5zKCK5RcLp YLFgRFN3BE+Xxb63RJyQOSTlte6BplbQahRML1U2furONBHs1foeK1uzLyyqMkQMEpkF ky44pGoVyrvSfu7mi2UV+KXWAkmXNVWu+p7pQKmTqTI2oJkvNPptRQ5NTes0GIzSzntx VPmA==
X-Received: by 10.43.143.4 with SMTP id jk4mr13256983icc.81.1373663369875; Fri, 12 Jul 2013 14:09:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from jtrentadams-isoc.local (c-76-25-71-111.hsd1.co.comcast.net. [76.25.71.111]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id nr4sm1668181igb.0.2013.07.12.14.09.28 for <multiple recipients> (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Fri, 12 Jul 2013 14:09:29 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <51E07088.7010401@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2013 15:09:28 -0600
From: "J. Trent Adams" <jtrentadams@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130620 Thunderbird/17.0.7
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: dmarc@ietf.org
References: <B427BC73-C3CA-4C92-AEA5-A6FC7ADB1423@vigilsec.com>
In-Reply-To: <B427BC73-C3CA-4C92-AEA5-A6FC7ADB1423@vigilsec.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.5.1
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] Draft DMARC BOF Agenda
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dmarc>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2013 21:09:34 -0000

I'd offer a friendly amendment to the agenda for consideration:

On 7/10/13 2:53 PM, Russ Housley wrote:
> We have discussed the BOF agenda, and this structure still seems to be the right one.
>
>       DMARC BOF Agenda
>
>       Summary of DMARC
>         -- Goal: Common foundation of DMARC
>         -- Note: DMARC specification is being AD sponsored
>
>       Summary of Open Issues
>         -- Goal: What is left for a working group to do?

It seems that there are likely to be a couple different interpretations
of the "Open Issues" topic. So far, it seems that most of the questions
needing answers revolve around interpretations of policy on either side.
Since we already have a start at identifying some issues, I believe it'd
be worth the time to discuss them.

As a reminder, here's a link to the draft that's been offered as input
to the proposed work group:

http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-crocker-dmarc-bcp-02.txt

In that light, I propose breaking the topic into "Possible Technical
Issues" and "Deployment & Usage Issues".

HTH,
Trent

>
>       Charter review
>         -- Goal: Discuss the draft charter
>
>       Hums
>         -- Facilitator: Barry Leiba
>         -- Goal: Is there adequate support for a DMARC WG?
>
> At this time, I am also calling for volunteers to take minutes and to jabber scribe.
>
> Rus
> _______________________________________________
> dmarc mailing list
> dmarc@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc

-- 
J. Trent Adams

Profile: http://www.mediaslate.org/jtrentadams/
LinkedIN: http://www.linkedin.com/in/jtrentadams
Twitter: http://twitter.com/jtrentadams

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email