IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dmarc-ietf] Proposed rework of the wording in section 2.1 of draft-dmarc-interoperability

"Kurt Andersen (b)" <kboth@drkurt.com> Tue, 08 December 2015 23:57 UTC

Return-Path: <kurta@drkurt.com>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4B971AD213 for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 8 Dec 2015 15:57:34 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.378
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.378 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id E_HhcaiuUHHu for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 8 Dec 2015 15:57:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-qg0-x22b.google.com (mail-qg0-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c04::22b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0AEB21AD151 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Tue, 8 Dec 2015 15:57:25 -0800 (PST)
Received: by qgeb1 with SMTP id b1so45474715qge.1 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Tue, 08 Dec 2015 15:57:24 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=drkurt.com; s=20130612; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:cc:content-type; bh=SbhYp4jbU49wgGqS4YNz9WkcWptP8Q8mumoEzj44L7g=; b=SBBrvsXKoe4eq/chX0iPpqT9KVS5kI5jHrNA4obxasoWGNF2rRLg/iiYdRSUzV1bMR oPxAXE9DnYxK6ftXVTq1CILaBpw7+rtLOxGrNTmkq9DE6OkEe0L9lZLCPcx1R7QhJXCt 4nFshV7MfgT0tSpoRohZNn/d9V33vZeZVevcE=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=SbhYp4jbU49wgGqS4YNz9WkcWptP8Q8mumoEzj44L7g=; b=ioydlFM1FAHJYZn36sFxZLxhE2n8Ircxs0CiOQaZWYO8Wo5Aj19w2mA9hW2s7+M8fv WLZAEL7L89qqPJjSUGPbmoYJTEkkXd5v29AbrYE5KlVdUjO/U2LhvkoHuEfFnDEA7714 6mKEiFljzhI51QWTg57JOvhs0dUgv8fldDyVyYjnqLdX573E/9UFOms8ZGdViFYFA8ZB oLVAapBjq97pdVlzZc4FHIxFo5sSRv0+lonFzobuJmo8xn4puxTjsmZ3R03mMdqeQUmG H08IRJ41I+i2JLI9FU84MHlcKlEBmnPzFILEkTVOtD1iOz1cFt8N42+Sq1vLvbW8YVa/ DnNA==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQl+JYKsnS1W0yBubfQNRFPwSU5CvcvDX8yDBGDHh931+wx6adUmn9/2fa4FbbR62IqItGEFRpnzy4iOUl5EeapV25QjFQ==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.140.142.206 with SMTP id 197mr8916466qho.77.1449619044209; Tue, 08 Dec 2015 15:57:24 -0800 (PST)
Sender: kurta@drkurt.com
Received: by 10.55.198.219 with HTTP; Tue, 8 Dec 2015 15:57:24 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <20151208210031.62812.qmail@ary.lan>
References: <CABuGu1r6r6Pxt3GfHKGHYWZL1pCw12ZrYGjMLDCJ4URJWQ1Yuw@mail.gmail.com> <20151208210031.62812.qmail@ary.lan>
Date: Tue, 08 Dec 2015 15:57:24 -0800
X-Google-Sender-Auth: SXNq6PW5A3-XtaMhjV_1mUikWkI
Message-ID: <CABuGu1ocQ55TqZRwWJOzOSJzjZwZgzXDv06UrzVvY7sGcnSSJQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: "Kurt Andersen (b)" <kboth@drkurt.com>
To: John Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a11373a7a30acd805266bbc4f"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/GXtZ2Zbb3CceOzP4YgQX1T4N4FM>
Cc: "dmarc@ietf.org" <dmarc@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] Proposed rework of the wording in section 2.1 of draft-dmarc-interoperability
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Dec 2015 23:57:35 -0000

On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 1:00 PM, John Levine <johnl@taugh.com> wrote:

> >I can put together an appendix with some examples. I was thinking that
> >having a better explanation would provide more value so I guess I got your
> >suggestion backwards :-)
>
> I'd prefer that you post the current version of the draft so we can
> see what the context is.  Draft revisions are cheap, posting three in
> a week if there are changes is not unreasonable.
>
> R's,
> John
>

-13 has now been posted with these changes in full context.

--Kurt

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email