IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dmarc-ietf] Proposed rework of the wording in section 2.1 of draft-dmarc-interoperability

"John Levine" <johnl@taugh.com> Tue, 08 December 2015 21:00 UTC

Return-Path: <johnl@taugh.com>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24C871A8025 for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 8 Dec 2015 13:00:55 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.862
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.862 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_20=-0.001, HELO_MISMATCH_COM=0.553, HOST_MISMATCH_NET=0.311, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id l1zbl6jckZ7T for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 8 Dec 2015 13:00:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: from miucha.iecc.com (abusenet-1-pt.tunnel.tserv4.nyc4.ipv6.he.net [IPv6:2001:470:1f06:1126::2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5C16F1A6FA6 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Tue, 8 Dec 2015 13:00:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: (qmail 65124 invoked from network); 8 Dec 2015 21:00:53 -0000
Received: from unknown (64.57.183.18) by mail1.iecc.com with QMQP; 8 Dec 2015 21:00:53 -0000
Date: Tue, 08 Dec 2015 21:00:31 -0000
Message-ID: <20151208210031.62812.qmail@ary.lan>
From: John Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
To: dmarc@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <CABuGu1r6r6Pxt3GfHKGHYWZL1pCw12ZrYGjMLDCJ4URJWQ1Yuw@mail.gmail.com>
Organization:
X-Headerized: yes
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/YSCJMd1NDLZD_XpkoRW4YOwFzQU>
Cc: kboth@drkurt.com
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] Proposed rework of the wording in section 2.1 of draft-dmarc-interoperability
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Dec 2015 21:00:55 -0000

>I can put together an appendix with some examples. I was thinking that
>having a better explanation would provide more value so I guess I got your
>suggestion backwards :-)

I'd prefer that you post the current version of the draft so we can
see what the context is.  Draft revisions are cheap, posting three in
a week if there are changes is not unreasonable.

R's,
John

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email